HomeHome   SearchSearch   Log inLog in   Back to naderlibrary.comnaderlibrary.com 

I Can Be A Philosopher, Too!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nader Library Forum Index -> Librarian's Comments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And he was also a Thuggee:

The Red Book, by Carl Jung wrote:
Unguided by the eye of reason, unmitigated by humaneness, the fire becomes a devastating, bloodthirsty Kali, who devours the life of man from within, as the mantra of her sacrificial ceremony says: "Hail to you, O Kali, triple-eyed Goddess of dreadful aspect, from whose throat hangs a necklace of human skulls. May you be honored with this blood!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the gnostics think they're better than the Judeo-Christians.

The Red Book, by Carl Jung wrote:
This is no polytheism that I have made up, but many Gods who powerfully raise their voices and tear humanity to bloody pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But there is one thing I would never do: deify nature, like the Taoists and so many others. And no, I don't believe that nature is a woman. There's nothing good about killing and death, and that proves this universe to be made by an inferior force or god, if gods are what produce universes. Which I don't think there's any evidence for whatsoever. Maybe it's just inferior creatures. Whatever -- the inferior mind is here. I'm glad there's the good parts about nature, and I so admire the animals that choose to eat grass and just want to be left alone. I was studying the herbivores the other night and came across a dead giant tortoise. It's head and arms were extended to the greatest length outside its shell, and its eyes were wide open, as if to confront the universe in all its cruelty and death. It was the most profound picture I had ever seen. I cried with wracking sobs for the tortoise who died. My favorite Tibetan lama used to save ants from out of the burning woodstove fire.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The big problem with speaking in parables, metaphors and symbols is that you'll be misunderstood.
Then, you went to all that trouble for nothing.
Better to say what you mean, and have people understand you.
Unless you're a coward, and you think people will lynch you if they know what you mean.
Or you don't care to speak to anyone but your brethren-in-war.
The Superman will surely come from the elite freemasonry class of which you are a part.
It could happen that they could come from the superfluous ones
But the probability of that happening is probably not worth the bother.
So who cares if the superfluous ones understand you or not?
Fuck 'em -- dog meat, anyway.
The question is, how many elite freemasons can you get on your side when you make your play for power?
How many kings?
Haven't you heard?
God is dead.
The Sun is my Goddess.
I AM THE GREAT CREATOR.
I don't worship frogs.
So thought Nietzsche who some call an atheist.
He wasn't talking to you superfluous ones.
What impudence.
Down: pig, hunchback, dwarf, jew -- WOMAN!
Only the WOMAN is superfluous.
He's not the light, gay man he thinks he is.
But who else are you going to talk to other than the people who understand your cipher language?
I'm sure every freemason praises the day another freemason is born.
That's why it's passed down from father to son.
They need the numbers.
The problem with Nietzsche is he didn't go far enough.
He never took off ALL of his clothes
To become a real creator.
If he had, they would have kicked him out on his ass.
Maybe that's why he spent his last days in an insane asylum.
Not exactly voluntary, you might say.
He was way out there.
I'm sure some Catholics hated him, not to mention some Jews.
He lied about his solitude, and kept his animal friends.
He is the hard-hearted Zoroaster who kills
What kind of enlightenment is that?
He never saw the abyss of nothingness.
Only the wicked and forbidden bottom.
What a poseur.
He couldn't abandon his myths.


Notes on Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Anthony M. Ludovici wrote:
As I have already pointed out, his philosophy is quite esoteric. It can serve no purpose with the ordinary, mediocre type of man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't there seem to be something terribly wrong when you can't find out anything about a people who are said to have existed written by their own hand, only stories written by people outside their supposed borders and times, some of them even 6,000 years after the thing supposedly happened? It seems to be all about bedazzling a people with stories of a foreign land, and stories of famous persons, for political, religious, and economic purposes. And the politicians, clerics, and merchants create and control the stories. Obviously, that's what's going on with most of these "classical histories" we read about. The "history" is a myth. Like the 'histories" of Pythagoras, Paracelsus, Zarathustra, Atlantis, Shangri-la, and the Hebrew prophets.

The argument that I hear over and over again from seemingly intelligent people, is that if we could just convince everyone of the irrationality of their behavior, they would drop it and do the smart thing. And if people only knew what was true and what was false, what was hurtful and what was beneficial, they would stop their bad behavior, since to continue would be like breaking a moral law. THAT MAKES ME GUFAW OUT LOUD. As if people don't damn well know what they are doing. And could give a shit for your true and false. And like their sadism, cannibalism, satan-worshipping, child molesting, and human trafficking.

Take the freemasons, for example. Do they care if you prove that they are not Khazars, that they are not descendants of heroes, that they weren't born of giants, that UFOs are a military operation, and Atlantis didn't exist? No, because they created the myths in the first place to serve their own purposes, which is about motivating through FANTASY. Screw you and your reality trip. Do your DNA and archaeological studies, write your scholarly papers, and argue your disbelief until you drop dead, it's not going to change a thing. And, contrary to your expectations, you've just provided their mythological activity, their quest for the holy grail, with cover: their thing doesn't exist. Because it's not a matter of your identification of them, but of their identification of themselves. And because realitly is no threat to them, they can be many people at once: Atlantians, Khazars, Aryans, Gods, Reptiles and Space-Men, anyone but themselves. And they are going to continue worshiping frogs and suns and hating women and poor Jews, (I didn't say rich Jews), and twisting every truth, and rewriting every myth, and engaging in conspiracies to take over the world, and trying to get as much control over people's beliefs that they can. Because "beliefs" don't follow anyone's laws. It's like a wild card. The only requirement for grabbing the hearts and minds of the people is imagination, money, and media power.

And no one is going to believe MY myth, which is that the world could be a safe, happy, healthy place for everyone if people would just stop killing each other, engage with reality, and stop worshiping gods, goddesses, and devils. The problem is there are those who say: "What need have we for safety, happiness, and health? That is for the inferior ones." So my argument has no power over them, including my reply which is, "You are big fat, liars. Safety, happiness and health is exactly what you want, you just won't admit it because you're stupid, stubborn and cult-conditioned. So go ahead -- believe something that's not true, and then call yourself 'the truthtellers'. Destroy the world and see how much satisfaction that gives you, which will be absolutely none."

It is impossible to communicate with these people. Even if we went to another planet, they'd chase us down and kill us, just to prove that they are dragons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZERO UTOPIAN KNIGHT

After I get control of this tidal wave of nausea and loathing caused by reading Nietzsche's "Thus Spake Zarathustra," I am going to tell everyone how much I hate him.
After taking stock of the total ruination, the broken trees, the empty landscape with nothing but sticks and stones left over from all of our, and our ancestors' , hard-working past, I am going to unleash my loathing back on him and anyone who defends and protects this super monster, hideous demon of a man they call a philosopher, and rebut for all time the idea that he was a good, loving, compassionate, woman-loving, Jew-loving, people-loving man.
The word "man" flees from him. It wants nothing to do with him, and not because it is lower than him, but because it is higher than him --
It has nothing to do with how much money and status man has.
This ass-licker of the rich is a horror, a nightmare, a pestilence, a demon, a rogue, a killer, an aberration.
I wish that he was an abortion.
Flushed down the toilet in an accident that brought no pain to his mother
Because it would surely be better that he had never lived
Horror of horrors, Rudra of his time, the apotheosis of ego, causing wailing and gnashing of teeth
Unleashing the horrors of the holocaust on poor, defenseless humanity
Hating everyone: man, woman and child.
Nightmare in the forest
Old Man on the mountain
Anti-Buddha
Anti-Zoroaster
Anti-Christ
Would that he had been accidentally run over by a car
Or struck by a deadly childhood disease
As a baby, rolled over and never breathed again
Than that he had lived to write his demented prophecy, demonic wisdom advice
to his adoring Memphis Misraim Rosicrucian acolytes who sat adoringly at his feet.
That he was a Father/Grand Master there is no doubt
He speaks with authority
"Hear that, ye boys!"
He was NOT an atheist
He was an agnostic/gnostic/pagan
Spirit, soul, wisdom-as-woman, snake, bird, sun, eternity, reincarnation, gnosis, gods plural, and earth as a living spirit -- these are gnostic/pagan views
Enough! with "Nietzsche was an atheist"
He was a Kultist in the traditional style, with only a few variations: without the nameless God and Frog Demon of Carl Jung.
He wanted to go beyond good and evil, the age-old Zoroastrian duality
And embrace evil wholly
"Satan is the god of this planet and the only God," said Madame Blavatsky, his cohort of the hated sex
He was yet another German philosopher who hated democracy and virtue, and deified the State and Monarch, no matter what he says to the contrary.
He was a professional liar, like the CIA.
Where was the medicine of Thomas Paine to cure his mistakes?
It's as if he never happened for the German philosophers and us other students of philosophy
The 18th Century enlightenment was an illusion, a bubble on the landscape of an ever present ancient/primitive/medieval German world
We never got out of King Henry IV's fortress
Where the Knights Templar, the Knights of Malta, and the Hashishin Assassins play their sick war drama forever, always to a new generation of enthralled and ignorant teenagers.
Never will we be allowed to forget the crucifixion of Jacques de Molay,
the thunder of horses' hooves and clashing swords of the Crusades
Bloody battlefields and clever rock-throwing machines that could bring down castle walls.
Weary, confused pilgrims
Mad, killer popes and plagues
I am sick to death of this horror and carnage
Push the wave back
Push the wave back
Bury him under a mountain of obloquy
Don't let him continue to influence our world
And be taught in our schools as if he was a revered Western philosopher
He was a Nazi.
Oh, Nietzsche -- revulsion, revulsion, revulsion!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not So Super, Man!, by Tara Carreon
(Line drawings of central figure and lotus base by Susan Hunt, with slight emendations)




Enlarged version here: http://naderlibrary.com/nietzsche.SMALL4.jpg

Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
Unto these men of to-day will I not be LIGHT, nor be called light. THEM will I blind: lightning of my wisdom! put out their eyes!


http://naderlibrary.com/thusspakezara.toc.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You want to know what the Superman is? I bet you don't know. Everyone buries it in all that seemingly religious nonsense about "going beyond 'man'." Certainly, you couldn't find out by reading Nietzsche's "Thus Spake Zarathustra," unless you noticed just one particular passage, and one only, hidden deep inside Chapter 56, made contrary to and agreeing with several of his previous statements. These gnostic propagandists are subtle and Orwellian with their "reconciliation of opposites." Nietzsche reminds me of Leo Strauss. He's not going to show you his hand, for God's sake. When the cards are being played, he'll show you his winning card, but only in code. If you knew what it said plainly, you'd lynch him, like George Bush said. These guys speak their coded language in English, German, French, Latin, Greek, Italian and Sanskrit, just for starters. They like ELABORATE word games. You can't even begin to understand them unless you know these languages and can riff on the various sounds of the words in them.

Take the famous saying by Ibn Mansur Al Hallaj, the "Qu'ranic Christ," who made "the dangerous and fatal "ejaculation," 'ANA' L HAQ (I am the Truth)." Well, that Arabic word "Ana" is just FULL, FULL, FULL of meanings and word games that, when put together, tell a complete gnostic/nazi story. And reading Pir Vilayat Khan's "Toward the One" is what gave me the clue to finding out what the Superman is, along with reading George Bernard Shaw's "Man and Superman," and other gnostic texts.

The passage from Nietzsche's book was this:


Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
Therefore, O my brethren, a NEW NOBILITY is needed, which shall be the adversary of all populace and potentate rule, and shall inscribe anew the word "noble" on new tables. For many noble ones are needed, and many kinds of noble ones, FOR A NEW NOBILITY! Or, as I once said in parable: "That is just divinity, that there are Gods, but no God!"


This, along with many similar utterances, nails Nietzsche as a gnostic. And no, it's not just "poetry." And it also explains that the Superman is the NEW NOBILITY -- i.e., members of their gnostic kult -- who will lord it over the people as tyrants, Leo Strauss style, AND be Gods -- plural -- in the gnostic view of things.

All this also explains the movie "Ghostbuster." Another "Ana" is what we might call "The Mother of all 'Anas'" -- "MA'ANA," THE CONCEALED SECRET, SIRR AL GHAYB, THE CONSTERNATION OF INTELLIGENCES. "Ghostbusters" isn't about just ordinary "spooks." Remember what I said about word play, otherwise known to Nazis as "folk etymology"? If you're not into puns, you can't get into their game, which is the game of certain intelligence agents.


Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
With the old Deities hath it long since come to an end: -- and verily, a good joyful Deity-end had they! They did not "begloom" themselves to death -- that do people fabricate! On the contrary, they LAUGHED themselves to death once on a time! That took place when the unGodliest utterance came from a God himself the utterance: "There is but one God! Thou shalt have no other Gods before me!" An old grim-beard of a God, a jealous one, forgot himself in such wise: -- And all the Gods then laughed, and shook upon their thrones, and exclaimed: "Is it not just divinity that there are Gods, but no God?" He that hath an ear let him hear.


But there was a big difference between the "I am" of the Nazis, and the "I am" of the other "I am" gnostics that had to do with the particularly pagan/aristocratic notion of "Gods" vs. "God." We're not just talking about the typical gnostic "Nameless God" that is the counterpart real God to the Jewish poseur-God Jehovah.

Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
Thou thinkest thyself wise, thou proud Zarathustra! Read then the riddle, thou hard nut-cracker, the riddle that I am! Say then: who am I!" ...

Too long have we acknowledged them to be right, those petty people: SO we have at last given them power as well; and now do they teach that 'good is only what petty people call good.' And 'truth' is at present what the preacher spake who himself sprang from them, that singular saint and advocate of the petty people, who testified of himself: 'I am the truth.' That immodest one hath long made the petty people greatly puffed up, he who taught no small error when he taught: 'I am the truth.'...

A wanderer am I, who have walked long at thy heels; always on the way, but without a goal, also without a home: so that verily, I lack little of being the eternally Wandering Jew, except that I am not eternal and not a Jew....

"Yea! I AM Zarathustra, the godless!"


I mean, it would make you laugh out loud, if it wasn't all so tragic.

I guess if "Ghostbusters" had been really thorough, they would have highlighted the conflict within gnosticism by having two Gozars, one asking: "Are you a god?" and the other asking "Are you God?", and both of them fighting with each other as well as with the rest of us. I guess they didn't want an apocalypse. It's like a game of Russian Dolls: monotheism within monotheism within monotheism. Or else something completely different -- POLYTHEISM AND THE SUPERMAN! Beyond good and evil? Now I AM laughing out loud.



http://www.naderlibrary.com/GHOST.toc.htm

And there is one more problem that Nietzsche highlights with the "I am God" gnostics, which makes them fall into the same trap as their Jewish monotheistic enemies, which is their similar hatred of the body. I guess it makes it hard for his group of gnostics to gain adherents among them. I guess further that the "I am a god" people don't have this kind of problem. This is also a very pagan concern.

Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
Too well do I know those godlike ones: they insist on being believed in, and that doubt is sin. Too well, also, do I know what they themselves most believe in. Verily, not in backworlds and redeeming blood-drops: but in the body do they also believe most; and their own body is for them the thing-in-itself. But it is a sickly thing to them, and gladly would they get out of their skin. Therefore hearken they to the preachers of death, and themselves preach backworlds.


Further, Nietzsche says that he would only believe in a God that knew how to dance. That is also very pagan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds like Nietzsche is talking about Rudolf Steiner, or Blavatsky's theosophists here. Why does he call them "apostates" and chastise them for praying? Because they are all part of the same Kult. I wonder what the secret story is behind Nietzsche's sister asking Rudolf Steiner to oversee Nietzsche's ouevre after he went into the insane asylum. Steiner's people say, "That doesn't mean Steiner was Nietzsche's disciple." Well, them saying he wasn't makes me think HE WAS. That's the rule I follow: If they say they aren't, they are. Especially those Steiner people. They are in such denial about the fact that Steiner was a nazi. I just love it how all these so-called "Leftist" New Age do-gooders worship Nazis. Can you imagine what a big kick the Nazis get out of this fact today? They're all like, "You SAY you hate the nazis, but you eat, drink, and sleep nazis. Pshaw on "you hate nazis." But they never say that, of course, because that would give the game away.

Thus Spake Zarathustra, by Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:
"We have again become pious" -- so do those apostates confess; and some of them are still too pusillanimous thus to confess.

Unto them I look into the eye, -- before them I say it unto their face and unto the blush on their cheeks: Ye are those who again PRAY!

It is however a shame to pray! Not for all, but for thee, and me, and whoever hath his conscience in his head. For THEE it is a shame to pray!

Thou knowest it well: the faint-hearted devil in thee, which would fain fold its arms, and place its hands in its bosom, and take it easier: -- this faint-hearted devil persuadeth thee that "there IS a God!"

THEREBY, however, dost thou belong to the light-dreading type, to whom light never permitteth repose: now must thou daily thrust thy head deeper into obscurity and vapour!

And verily, thou choosest the hour well: for just now do the nocturnal birds again fly abroad. The hour hath come for all light-dreading people, the vesper hour and leisure hour, when they do not -- "take leisure."

I hear it and smell it: it hath come -- their hour for hunt and procession, not indeed for a wild hunt, but for a tame, lame, snuffling, soft-treaders', soft-prayers' hunt, --

-- For a hunt after susceptible simpletons: all mouse-traps for the heart have again been set! And whenever I lift a curtain, a night-moth rusheth out of it.

Did it perhaps squat there along with another night-moth? For everywhere do I smell small concealed communities; and wherever there are closets there are new devotees therein, and the atmosphere of devotees.

They sit for long evenings beside one another, and say: "Let us again become like little children and say, 'good God!'" -- ruined in mouths and stomachs by the pious confectioners.

Or they look for long evenings at a crafty, lurking cross-spider, that preacheth prudence to the spiders themselves, and teacheth that "under crosses it is good for cobweb-spinning!"

Or they sit all day at swamps with angle-rods, and on that account think themselves PROFOUND; but whoever fisheth where there are no fish, I do not even call him superficial!

Or they learn in godly-gay style to play the harp with a hymn-poet, who would fain harp himself into the heart of young girls: -- for he hath tired of old girls and their praises.

Or they learn to shudder with a learned semi-madcap, who waiteth in darkened rooms for spirits to come to him -- and the spirit runneth away entirely!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let no one doubt that the Nazi idea that some Jews were more equal than others is a Gnostic/Rosicrucian idea. In the 14th Chapter of Max Heindel's "The Rosicrucian Cosmo-Conception," after a seemingly endless stream of anti-Jewish bigotry, you can read the following:

http://www.naderlibrary.com/cult.rosicruciancosmo.toc.htm

The Rosicrucian Cosmo-Conception, by Max Heindel wrote:
Jehovah and his Mission

There has been much learned discussion concerning the discrepancy between, and especially the authorship of the creation story of the first chapter and that which starts at the fourth verse of the second chapter. It is asserted that the two accounts were written by different men, because the Being or Beings, the name of Whom the translators have rendered as "God" in both the first and second chapters of the English version, are, in the Hebrew text, called "Elohim" in the first chapter, and "Jehovah" in the second chapter. It is argued that the same narrator would not have named God in two different ways.

Had he meant the same God in both cases, he probably would not, but he was not a monotheist. He knew better than to think of God as simply a superior Man, using the sky for a throne and the earth for a footstool. When he wrote of Jehovah, he meant the Leader Who had charge of the particular part of the work of Creation which was then being described. Jehovah was and is one of the Elohim. He is the Leader of the Angels who were the humanity of the Moon Period and He is Regent of our Moon. The reader is referred to diagram 14 for an accurate understanding of the position and constitution of Jehovah.

As Regent of Our Moon, He has charge of the degenerate, evil Beings there, and He also rules the Angels. With Him are some of the Archangels, who were the humanity of the Sun Period. They are the "Race-Spirits".

It is the work of Jehovah to build concrete bodies or forms, by means of the hardening, crystallizing Moon forces. Therefore He is the giver of children and the Angels are His messengers in this work. It is well known to physiologists that the Moon is connected with gestation; at least, they have observed that it measures and governs the period of intra-uterine life and other physiological functions.

The Archangels, as Spirits and Leaders of a Race, are known to fight for or against a people, as the exigencies of the evolution of that Race demand. In Daniel x:20 an Archangel speaking to Daniel, says, "And now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come."

The Archangel Michael is the Race-spirit of the Jews (Daniel xii:1), but Jehovah is not the god of the Jews alone; He is the Author of all Race-religions which led up to Christianity. Nevertheless, it is true that He did take a special interest in the progenitors of the present degenerate Jews -- the Original Semites, the "seed-race" for the seven races of the Aryan Epoch. Jehovah, of course, takes special care of a seed-race, in which are to be inculcated the embryonic faculties of the humanity of a new Epoch. For that reason He was particularly concerned with the Original Semites. They were His "chosen people" -- chosen to be the seed for a new Race, which was to inherit the "Promised Land" -- not merely insignificant Palestine, but the entire Earth, as it is at present.

He did not lead them out of Egypt. That story originated with their descendants and is a confused account of their journey eastward through flood and disaster out of the doomed Atlantis into the "wilderness" (the Desert of Gobi in Central Asia), there to wander during the cabalistic forty years, until they could enter the Promised Land. There is a double and peculiar significance to the descriptive word "promised" in this connection. The land was called the "promised Land" because, as land or earth suitable for human occupation, it did not exist at the time the "chosen people" were led into the "wilderness." Part of the Earth had been submerged by floods and other parts changed by volcanic eruptions, hence it was necessary that a period of time elapse before the new Earth was in a fit condition to become the possession of the Aryan Race.

The Original Semites were set apart and forbidden to marry into other tribes or peoples, but they were a stiff-necked and hard people, being yet led almost exclusively by desire and cunning, therefore they disobeyed the command. Their Bible records that the sons of God married the daughters of man -- the lower grades of their Atlantean compatriots. They thus frustrated the designs of Jehovah and were cast off, the fruit of such cross-breeding being useless as seed for the coming Race.

These cross-breeds were the progenitors of the present Jews, who now speak of "lost tribes." They know that some of the original number left them and went another way, but they do not know that those were the few who remained true. The story of the ten tribes being lost is a fable. Most of them perished, but the faithful ones survived, and from that faithful remnant have descended the present Aryan Races
.


Houston Stewart Chamberlain expresses the same ideas in The Foundations of the 19th Century.

http://www.naderlibrary.com/cult.foundninecentchamberlain.htm

Houston Stewart Chamberlain, The Foundations of the 19th Century wrote:
When we study the Sacred Books of the Jews we see further that the conversion of this monopolytheistic people to the ever sublime (though according to our Ideas mechanical and materialistic) conception of a true cosmic monotheism was not the work of the community, but of a mere fraction of the people; indeed this minority had to wage a continuous warfare against the majority, and was compelled to enforce the acceptance of its more exalted view of life by means of the highest Power to which man is heir, the might of personality. As for the rest of the people, unless the Prophets were guilty of gross exaggeration, they convey the impression of a singularly vulgar crowd, devoid of every higher aim, the rich hard and unbelieving, the poor fickle and ever possessed by the longing to throw themselves into the arms of the wretchedest and filthiest idolatry. The course of Jewish history has provided for a peculiar artificial selection of the morally higher section: by banishments, by continual withdrawals to the Diaspora -- a result of the poverty and oppressed condition of the land -- only the most faithful (of the better classes) remained behind, and these abhorred every marriage contract -- even with Jews! -- in which both parties could not show an absolutely pure descent from one of the tribes of Israel and prove their strict orthodoxy beyond all doubt. There remained then no great choice; for the nearest neighbours, the Samaritans, were heterodox, and in the remoter parts of the land, except in the case of the Levites who kept apart, the population was to a large extent much mixed. In this way race was here produced. And when at last the final dispersion of the Jews came, all or almost all of these sole genuine Jews were taken to Spain. The shrewd Romans in fact knew well how to draw distinctions, and so they removed these dangerous fanatics, these proud men, whose very glance made the masses obey, from their Eastern home to the farthest West, while, on the other hand, they did not disturb the Jewish people outside of the narrower Judea more than the Jews of the Diaspora. -- Here, again, we have a most interesting object-lesson on the origin and worth of "race"! For of all the men whom we are wont to characterise as Jews, relatively few are descended from these great genuine Hebrews, they are rather the descendants of the Jews of the Diaspora, Jews who did not take part in the last great struggles; who, indeed, to some extent did not even live through the Maccabean age; these and the poor country people who were left behind in Palestine, and who later in Christian ages were banished or fled, are the ancestors of "our Jews" of to-day. Now whoever wishes to see with his own eyes what noble race is, and what it is not, should send for the poorest of the Sephardim from Salonici or Sarajevo (great wealth is very rare among them, for they are men of stainless honour) and put him side by side with any Ashkenazim financier; then will he perceive the difference between the nobility which race bestows and that conferred by a monarch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display replies from:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nader Library Forum Index -> Librarian's Comments All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
Page 6 of 24

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group