HomeHome   SearchSearch   Log inLog in   Back to naderlibrary.comnaderlibrary.com 

MATTHEW INMAN OF "THE OATMEAL" SUCKS!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nader Library Forum Index -> Wild In The Streets!
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


The Conquest of Inman-Rudra by Padmasambhava/Hayagriva

http://www.american-buddha.com/07%20-%20Ghost%20on%20the%20Highway.mp3

Ghost on the Highway
by Jeffrey Lee Pierce


It's cloudy in the west, it looks like rain
my eyes are black holes and i'm burning away

you slaughtered your loving man
killed him in his sleep
the blood and crying of your murder
simply stains your sheets

Now, you're a ghost on the highway
your gesture is meaningless
you're lost to the living men
trailing souls to the end

You thought winning as a woman, meant failing as a friend
it is not an art statement, to drown a few passionate men,

you made yourself a diamond
to blind young men's eyes
you claim because they want your shine
they deserve to walk the line,

You're a ghost on the highway
your gesture is meaningless
you're lost forever to the living men
trailing souls to the end

Yes, I would give you my love
so my soul would not starve
but I could never move the honest rock
of what you really are,

You're a ghost on the highway
you're like straw and meaningless
I hate you, but I love you
I'll carry that to the end

If I ever lie with you again, I pray I do not sleep
If I ever closed my eyes again, I'd realize what you are to me.
you are simply a liar
an animal who bluffs and steals
until you become
a bigger creature's meal,

You're a ghost on the highway
you're trash and meaningless
I hate you, but I love you
I'll carry that to the end

You're a ghost on the highway
You're a ghost on the highway
You're a ghost on the highway
You're lost on the highway

http://www.american-buddha.com/abol-gunclub.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt Inman's people have been threatening several of our artist friends who have art up at American-Buddha.com. Wasn't that the whole thrust of Inman's outrage, that Charles Carreon DARED to threaten an artist with legal action? Like there was something sacred about artists. But it's okay when they threaten our artist friends. They think they have the right to ruin anyone's reputation on the Internet with their mob postings of thousands of hate comments on Amazon, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, hate websites, etc. As a society, we can't allow this kind of blackmail to occur on the Internet. This whole business of getting people to punch buttons to register their "like/dislike," and sites that allow comments about a person's work by the public, can be abused by a small group of people skilled in the art of manufacturing false identities to make it look like a lot of people rightfully hate someone. For example, Matt Inman's people made thousands of bad reviews about Charles' book, "The Sex.Com Chronicles," on Amazon. Obviously, a thousand people didn't read the book, and give it a fair assessment. They went in there to destroy Charles' reputation out of hate. Why should Amazon allow that kind of thing to happen? Why should any site allow something like that to happen to a person? It's a damn good book by an incredible writer, and the bad reviews are lies.

I think we should absolutely boycott sites that have this dangerous setup. You run afoul of the wrong people, and you're going to be fucked on those sites you love so much. Matt Inman is the wrong people. You don't want to have anything to do with him and his friends, like those horrible men Kenneth Paul White at Popehat and Marc Randazza of the Legal Satyricon, and TechDirt, and all the rest of those tech gossip-smear sites. They are bad, bad people. They are terrorizing people on the Internet, insisting on having everything THEIR way, depictign themselves as the good guys to get all your business, and pushing everyone else aside as the bad guys. It's simple economic warfare.

They are attacking free speech. And watch out if you use your real name: with their indestructible anonymity they will destroy your real name. They are engaged in a terrible attack on not only free speech, but our very IDENTITIES.

This could happen to you. What they are saying is: "Do what we want, OR ELSE!!!!!" They have the power of the Internet. People better start speaking out against it, and doing something about it. They're going to take down all the liberals and progressives with a bunch of lies on the Internet. It's so easy. Are you going to shut up when they tell you to shut up, while they keep talking because you're too fearful to oppose them? That's how the world got to be as fucked up as it is, because people didn't do anything to stop the bad people from running riot in the world.

And now there's money going to conservative groups like crazy as a result of the Citizens United decision. I've noticed that conservatives are even starting "Free Press" sites, now, to promote fascism. They're going to steal all of our progressive identification markers, and push us out of the game with the force of their enormous loads of money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My philosophy of life and art


Just Say "No" to Nihilism
by Tara Carreon


Quote:

the Empty Mirror: Photographic Art of Dharma in the West. Tashi Choling Tibetan Buddhist Meditation Center
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Howard Zinn's The People's History wrote:
"... those who are avariciously intent upon amassing wealth by the destruction of the more virtuous part of the community."

http://www.naderlibrary.com/lit.zinn.peoplehistorytoc.htm



Ken "Popehat" White Will See You Now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, Matt Inman:

You can say you did your part to kill those kids.

When are we as a society going to wake up and start condemning violence?

America is so fucking two-faced: Sure, violence against everyone else -- ho hum -- violence against ourselves -- WHAT AN OUTRAGE! Who knows what monsters these children have bred inside their minds, having consumed a lifetime of television sponsored by the Pentagon, the Mob, and the Church of Satan?

Yeah, Americans are so crazy-violent, that you're not even allowed to say the word "peace" in America, and Americans' greatest enemies have always been the peaceniks. Someone who says the word peace, will immediately have the entire punitive power of the national security state raining down on their head. The ridicule and spitting-venom hatred will start pouring down on you, and the Fox News commentators, Glenn Beck, the NRA, and all the other conservative assholes in America will be tearing you to hyena shreds, while the Democrats purse their pious lips, and nod quietly in assent. "Jesus brings not peace, but the sword!" And if you don't want to go to war, then you are going to go to prison, you draft-dodging traitor. War is America's business, killing is their meat of the day. Who can feel sorry for them when one of theirs goes on a rampage except for their schizophrenic killing selves? They're like, "You broke the rules of violence, and killed our babies." As if violence, once started, could be controlled.

Smart people will NOT be bringing children into this world. The fact that you have children, is the fact that you have no true love for them. The Indians stopped breeding when the British came. Get some native wisdom, people. This is no time or place to be breeding children for the slavers and killers. And in fact, if you haven't noticed, soon after they're born now, they develop little vampire teeth with which to tear each other and the rest of us apart. And their favorite movie is "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer."

People who don't oppose the status quo (ancien regime) support it, including the killing of their own children. It's just the taking of the firstborns in the Passover. If you got a problem with that, you got a problem with God, and then you REALLY do have a problem. Get rid of God -- the entire range, from Christian Personal to Gnostic Impersonal to Advaita Vedanta "It" -- and you get rid of violence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt Inman and Gang: This is what I think of your precious Cancer syndicate: they are a bunch of vampires and NSSM-200ers. Not in the least bit holy.

Killing, killing, killing, killing, killing ... that's all they know how to do. Somehow, we're all supposed to be Samsons with our cancer, and survive all the killing of cancer all around and in and is us. You want those last couple of months, don't you, to walk around the earth like the living dead, like a zombie? Like a defeated Aryan hero. (They always kill the heroes.) Look at the world they are creating for us. It's like a horror show. You always wanted to be a zombie, didn't you? Or did you, really? Not actually very wholesome. Not like eating a nice, organic peach on a summer day with your lover skinny-dipping in the stream beside you. With a copy of Thomas Paine's "Rights of Man" sitting in your lap, to read after you eat your peach. Then you're going to go home and have a nice organic dinner, without GMOs. Maybe watch a movie, then sit outside and look at the stars. And feel the saneness of nature untouched by chemical pollution. Wow, there's a fantasy for you. Something like that used to be possible, but really isn't anymore. The alchemists went crazy. They always were crazy, but they didn't have the power of the universe before, like they do now. I mean, the power of death. The power of world government. Squirting genes into any damn thing they feel like, and making monsters everywhere. Oooh, very, very scary the world they are taking us to. It's not actually a joke. This mother is very, very concerned that The Killing has begun in earnest. Money is not their concern -- they have plenty of that: death is. You're really not getting the point if you think they're doing it for money. Power over your life and death is much more to the point. In the time during which you give them the benefit of the doubt, the right to their own, perverted, power-hungry viewpoint, they're going to kill you.

So, let's see. They got my and my parent's generation to basically ignore it, and they got our children's generation to laugh at it. I guess they'll get the next generation to participate in it, The Killing of their family and friends. Don't worry, you participaters in The Killing -- you'll be too stupid to know what you're doing, so it will be completely painless. They will have fried your brain with one chemical or another. You'll think it's fun when you kill your mother. Like Ai Weiwei. You won't actually be a cool anarchist, you'll just be working for one of Killer Daddy's organizations, like the NED. I don't know what your nightmares will tell you when you're a brain-damaged killer. Probably, nothing coherent. Then, all will be chaos, and the Devil will win. And God will be no more. But what will the Devil do without God, and no one to play with? He'll have to revive him so he can kill him again, over and over and over again in the eternal return.

The fuckers, they poisoned the baby infant formula!!! And the ice cream.


http://www.naderlibrary.com/BLOODSPORT8.gif

[Dr. Michael A. Friedman, Dr. David A. Kessler, and Dr. J. Richard Crout Culling the Useless Eater Population in accordance with National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), by Henry Kissinger

If you want to give money for cancer treatment, give it to Dr. Burzynski. Then, your donation will mean something.

BURZYNSKI: THE MOVIE
Directed by Eric Merola
Featuring Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D., Julian Whitaker, M.D., and Richard Jaffe, Esq.
http://www.naderlibrary.com/burzynski.toc.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Kenneth Paul White really a pedophile?

J. Croft wrote:
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
AN OPEN LETTER TO POPEHAT.COM'S "KEN"
To "Ken" from popehat.com

In your second response, to my repost of your article you left this unctous piece of turd:

Ken said...

So -- you're refusing to take down copyrighted material you have taken and republished in full on your site?

OK. DMCA notice to the ISP it is.

Just out of curiosity -- are copyright laws somehow tools of oppressive government? Is being a thief somehow patriotic?


You pitching a bitch fit because who is supposed to be a fellow Patriot does the honor of putting up YOUR article, CREDITING YOU AND YOUR "POPEHAT"-you going to run like a little snitch bitch to the enemy? I shared what at the time I thought was an awesome piece of advice about contact with the enemy. This by the way is the first time I've had someone shit themselves over the honor. I'd kill to have my work copied, my message sent out. Guess being a libertarian does things to your thought process or something.

Freedom Guide has been my work for God and Country -- hell the whole sorry planet -- since 2005. Who are you to attack Free Speech? Are you some kind of fed? You must be.

Fuck with my blog and you fuck with me. You fuck with my Free Speech. You fuck with the Freedom Movement, the Patriot Movement -- remember what those are? You are a small, small "man" -- you and your ten or so groupies.

Do yourself and yours a favor -- reconsider and get over it. This is one thing you don't want to do.

And don't ever threaten me again.

J. Croft

http://freedomguide.blogspot.com/2011/03/open-letter-to-popehatcoms-ken.html

11 comments:

Michael said...
My one question here is why do you keep claiming that Ken is freaking out? He is very calmly telling you that you don't have his permission to reproduce his work, and he's dealing with it the simplest way possible. And he's going to win. It doesn't matter how angry you get; rage does not overpower rationality.

6:24 PM
Anonymous said...
I see you are a fellow agent of God! To quote the law of the land..

Zechariah 5:1-4

Again I lifted my eyes and saw, and behold, a flying scroll! And he said to me, "What do you see?" I answered, "I see a flying scroll. Its length is twenty cubits, and its width ten cubits." Then he said to me, "This is the curse that goes out over the face of the whole land. For everyone who steals shall be cleaned out according to what is on one side, and everyone who swears falsely shall be cleaned out according to what is on the other side. I will send it out, declares the Lord of hosts, and it shall enter the house of the thief, and the house of him who swears falsely by my name. And it shall remain in his house and consume it, both timber and stones."

Being a patriot and loyal agent to the Divine Lord himself, it is ordained that I set your house aflame for stealing.

8:18 PM
Zachary said...
Wat up J haven't been reading for long but big time fan. You told that pompous left wing asshole whats up man, good for u. What kind of writer doesn't want to be read by as many people as possible? Couldn't happen on a shitty little libertarian blog that theres thousands of ever since the stupid Ron Paul epidemic. Glad to see someone is still on the side of real America. And the fact that they're referred to as 'right wing" is retarted, as if legalizing drugs and demolishing taxes is going to turn US into happy peacetime ville.

Do these people even know how national economies work? Probably not since they just live off their mommys credit card or refunds or unemployment or any of the thousands of handouts that made our debt the way it is. All started by lefties, which, IMO includes libertarians. And that prick is a lawyer, the worst kind of them all.

And I wouldn't talk anonymous if youre not even man enough to type in your name when quoting the word of our lord.

Also J I checked out your myspace and noticed you liked system of a down! Theyre one of my favorites too, even though I don't really like their lyrics all the time. If you like them you should try these guys too. Their first album is all about bitch ass uppity lawyers.

8:47 PM
Scott Jacobs said...
Zach, there are so many things wrong with your comment, I don't even know where to start...

1 - Popehat has, I would wager, a higher readership than this place, probably because they come up with original content. I'd be willing to have a third party adjudicate via screen shots from site-meter or a similar method.

2 - They aren't "right wing". They are, with the exception of Ezra, libertarian.

3 - Considering most of them are private-practice lawyers, I would wager they have a far better grasp of economics than you.

4 - I realize that the two words share a bunch of letters, but "libertarians" are not the same as "liberals". In fact, they rarely intersect.

5 - Note my real name...

12:45 AM
Zachary said...
That's what I'm saying J, I hate when people group libertarians in with right wingers. And how could you say a lawyer has a better grasp on how bad the economy is than a real working class American? You don't know what you got til its gone I say.

Anyway man was just agreeing with you, those guys are a bunch of pussies. You shouldn't let yourself get so mad about them then they go and post on their blogs "Oh haha look how mad this righty blogger is thanks to us!" Don't let the enemy win, ever!

btw did u check out that band

9:00 PM
Anonymous said...
We all know that libertarians are ashamed of the fact that they are actually believers in a political ideology, since politicians in their eyes are fat, ugly vampires nurturing themselves by sucking the free spirit out of the back bones of ordinary citizens.

Cross-referencing that with the definition of lawyers, an omnipresent species of parasite known only to feast upon the vitality of human beings, and, alternatively, governments or corporations, we are able to define the opposing party as a bunch of vampires.

That being said, I agree with Zack, they probably don't get out much and hate the sun.

9:27 PM
J. Croft said...
Michael, if someone showed props to your work by reproducing it with link and attribution, the normal reaction would be of PRIDE.

Only a head-up-his-ass brand of libertarian would freak out and threaten a lawsuit... on a blog smaller than his. Hell I even gave him a note saying how awesome it was. Ken's reaction is that of a fucking 2 year old.

Truth overpowers rationality. Ken obviously rationalizes attacking others seeking Freedom.

Thanks for the props Zachary! Yes I have all of System Of A Down's albums. Funny you mention the Myspace page I haven't touched that in months.

Once upon a time libertarians could claim as a group to be doing something. Then they all got spun around by dupes and ringers and, well, what have they accomplished. Happens to every opponent of the beast which I why I stress Being Your Own Leader.

12:34 PM
Anonymous said...
So, did the Popehat - Kenneth P. White - actually go to the ISP and did they really make you take it down?

Just curious, really curious. Or was he just all online bluster and blow?

5:41 PM
Anonymous said...
I guess Ken just came in and threatened and got his way. He does that a lot. Honestly, the ISP would not have probably made you take that down and unless he had filed it with the United States copyright office within three months of publishing it, he had no real possibility of damages.

Ken is a bully - of the worst kind.

Watch for these IP Adresses at your blog:

204.9.177.195 - San Francisco - Charles

and

98.129.229.166 returns to San Antonio

IF what you posted was not filed with the United States Copyright Office WITHIN THREE MONTHS OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATION Kenneth P. White was shit out of luck in really doing you any harm.

He was just being a bully, again.

5:26 AM
Anonymous said...
You are never as anonymous as you believe yourself to be. Embedded metadata - gets them every time.

Ming the Merciless Siamese Cat:

EU Taxpayer: http://www.samefacts.com/2006/07/uncategorized/reparations-for-beirut-airport/

Now in the U.S.

http://previousleigh.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/hookernomics/

Bills his time at $650 per hour?

In Texas now?

Hmmmmmmmmm - Who could that be.

Metadata returns to Uxxxxe - and a Texas Firm that does bill at extremely high rates, though that claim may be a bit of an exaggeration.

Does his firm sanction this conduct?

Just curious == of course, the metadata could be wrong, I could be mistaken, not many lawyers paid EU taxes in 2006, bill at $650 per hour in Texas now, and have postings that include metadata with that unique name.

I guess that is a matter for his firm to ferret out. Typically, in these large firms you must register your pro bono help.

Wonder if Uxxxxe has done that? If it is Uxxxxe posting at various sites under the name: Ming the Merciless Siamese Cat

Only a subpoena will reveal that information.

9:59 AM
J. Croft said...
Anonymous...(s)

He got Google who runs Blogger to do the edit... I put it back up except for ONE WORD... wanna find it?

Fuck Ken... metaphorically cuz he looks like a fuckin' pedo.

As far as anonymity goes, you do what you can. Sometimes you actually succeed. Thanks for the imput(s).

2:30 PM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul Levy is obviously an enemy of Public Citizen, wasting all the donors' money on stupid lawsuits for idiots (Yes, Christopher Recouvreur, you are an idiot; and so are you, Ronald J. Riley; Popehat.com being Idiot Central, or is that Public Citizen, now?) If the Public Citizen donors only knew, like I do now, what they spend our hard-earned dollars on, they would never give another penny to Public Citizen. Paul Levy is bringing public interest lawsuits into disrepute, making them absurd and ridiculous: Fighting hard to make sure Wal-Qaeda's speech is unimpeded. Generally fighting for the rights of Internet Terrorists, Identity Thieves, and the Ku Klux Klan. Fuck him! Instead of using his time and money to fight for libraries on the Internet, or more specifically, having the vision to himself establish a library for Ralph Nader, the man whose back he's been riding on for the last 40 years, whose beneficial ouevre is so vast it is embedded in the fabric of our society, instead he goes against a lawyer who is working for free for someone trying to do that very thing. Paul Levy is scum. No, he aspires one day to be scum.

Look at how cold his eyes are. Like a machine, an automaton, a Terminator, all attention on his target. No sense of trying to present a pleasant face to the world, so it can feel good about itself. No compassion, no love, no style, no Buddha awareness. His weak chin makes me shiver. He's an ugly motherfucker. One more reason to hate white men. Yech! Every time I see one of them, I think, "Here comes another mongoloid." White men look like mongoloids to me. Fucking knuckle-scrapers. Completely Berserk Viking Barbarian Hordes!

He's worse than George Bush or Samuel P. Huntington, or any of the neocons with his warmaking style. His whole M.O. is "First Strike" and "Enemy Combatant." "You Afghanis or Iraquis dare to fight back when we come storming into your country, we're going to torture you forever." Or like the Rodney King cops: "Lay down, don't move, or we'll say you're resisting arrest. If you blink, we will consider that an aggressive, hostile act." Actually, he wants you to step up to the guillotine, put your head on the chopping block, and willingly let yourself be sacrificed by him.

Paul Levy is a motherfucker. A pervert. And he lies all the time to the Courts. His "advocacy" is trying to come up with new excuses about why he lied to the court, and new ways to pervert the law. Everything for him is not what has already happened, creating reasonable causes of action, but what COULD happen, as in THOUGHT CRIME. Reading his papers caused a powerful nausea and revulsion in me. He doesn't even bother to make his sentences complete or rational. Just burps, and puts that into the brief! Obviously too busy to do his work. He's Public Citizen, after all. And then he wants $700 per hour from his victims for his chaotic thrashing around. He is not someone distinguished and noble like Ralph Nader, but a weasel trying to make bad law, working the charity system, just like Matt Inman, pretending to be a White Knight when actually he's a Black Knight.

CALL TO PUBLIC CITIZEN FROM A FORMER-BUT-NEVER-AGAIN-DONOR: FIRE PAUL LEVY! HE IS NOT WORTHY OF PUBLIC CITIZEN. IN FACT, HE'S A TRAITOR TO THE PROGRESSIVE CAUSE.

Bet you dollars to donuts he's a Libertarian, which is just a fancy way of saying "Anarchist Republican." At the very least, he's a Communist. He's obviously intimately connected with Kenneth Paul White at Popehat.com and all his Libertarian friends. What business does a Libertarian or a Communist have working for Public Citizen?

What happened to Mr. Dozier after Paul Levy legally tortured him, like the CIA legally tortures Arabs? These guys know the law; they know what they can get away with! I know the poor guy died. Why? Because of what Paul Levy did to him? I know that a lot of lawyers in these violent days think it's cool if they can cause a witness to vomit, or have a heart attack, or die when they're questioning them, but I think this kind of thinking is repulsive and blameworthy.

Read about Paul Levy's shenanigans here: http://www.naderlibrary.com/matthewinman.charles-carreon.com.htm


Tara Carreon wrote:


http://www.naderlibrary.com/matthewinman.charles-carreon.com.htm

PUBLIC CITIZEN'S PAUL LEVY MAKING THE WORLD SAFE FOR IDENTITY THIEVES.
Alternative title: Limosnero con pistola.
by Tara Carreon

[Paul Levy] Your Name is Mine! And So Is Your Money!



Charles Carreon wrote:
CHARLES CARREON, ESQ. (127139)
Attorney pro se for Defendant Charles Carreon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER RECOUVREUR,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES CARREON,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-03435 RS
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE MOTION PURSUANT TO F.R.Civ.P. 6(b)

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

In his moving papers seeking an extension of time to thoroughly explore the machinery that plaintiff’s counsel has engaged in his efforts to strongarm defendant into making an unauthorized, undeserved, unearned, and unjust payment for “attorneys fees,” defendant cited authority showing that plaintiff’s counsel has tried to sell his wrongheaded application of the Lanham Act to other courts unsuccessfully. Plaintiff’s counsel’s silence regarding the judicial rebuffs his arguments suffered in the Eleventh and Fourth Circuits speaks volumes.

Mr. Levy is simply engaging in a form of forum shopping, eagerly seeking and recruiting clients who create gripe sites to file preemptive declaratory relief actions in various venues, hoping to coerce settlements from vulnerable defendants, or perhaps to lead some court into error by failing to disclose his prior defeats on the very same issue in other jurisdictions.

But for defendant’s diligence in searching for Mr. Levy’s fee-trolling history, this Court would not know of:

1. The denial of Mr. Levy’s fee application in Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., N.D. Georgia, Case no. 1:06-cv-526-TCB (the “Wal-Qaeda.com case”);

2. The dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in Riley v. Dozier Internet Law, E.D. Va. Case No. 3:08CV642-HEH, affirmed on appeal on other grounds in Riley v. Dozier Internet Law, PC, 371 Fed.Appx. 399; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6081 (2010); and,

3. The remand of Riley v. Dozier Internet Law, E.D. Va. Case No. 3:08CV642-HEH, in which Mr. Levy tried to spin a legally-untenable claim for attorney’s fees into the damages component of diversity jurisdiction in another no-dollar legal maneuver to defend the interests of a semi-slanderous cybersquatter.

Plaintiff’s opposition cites Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523 F.3d 973, 978 (9th Cir. Cal. 2008) for the proposition that the fee-recovery “tail” ought not to wag the merits “dog.” However, in seeking an outlandish award of fees in excess of $40,000 where the Court never adjudicated the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction or any material issue, the plaintiff accepted an offer of judgment, the judgment has been paid, and plaintiff’s counsel has not recovered a penny for his client beyond the costs of litigation, plaintiff’s counsel is precisely the one trying to “wag the dog.”

Camacho is good authority also for the general principle that, in the absence of an applicable fee-shifting statute, the American rule applies:

“‘Generally, litigants in the United States pay their own attorneys' fees, regardless of the outcome of the proceedings.’ However, ‘[i]n order to encourage private enforcement of the law . . . Congress has legislated that in certain cases prevailing parties may recover their attorneys' fees from the opposing side. When a statute provides for such fees, it is termed a 'fee shifting' statute.’”

Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523 F.3d 973, 978 (9th Cir. Cal. 2008), quoting Stanton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 965 (9th Cir. 2003).

Plaintiff has not cited a single case showing that a declaratory relief case filed to preempt a cybersquatting or trademark suit removes a case from the American Rule, nor has defendant found any such authority. Defendant has presented out-of-circuit authority ruling precisely the opposite, i.e., the Hon. Timothy C. Batten’s denial of Mr. Levy’s fee application in the Wal-Qaeda.com case, that plaintiff failed to disclose. (Exhibit 3 to moving papers.)

Northern District authority relevant by analogy supports Judge Batten’s denial of Mr. Levy’s request for fees. Less than two years ago, Judge Edward M. Chen ruled that a declaratory relief action based on a contract with an attorney’s fees clause is subject to the American Rule:

“Under California law, an insurer does not owe fees incurred by its insured in defending a declaratory judgment action on coverage.”

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Barnett, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12815 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2011), citing United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Dalrymple, 232 Cal. App. 3d 182, 187, 283 Cal. Rptr. 330 (1999) (award of attorney's fees for insured's defense of a declaratory relief action would violate American Rule)

The American Rule has its wisdom. Litigation ought not be encouraged, least of all over trivial matters like the right to publish a website using free software at a domain that costs the registrant $10 to register, for the purpose of simply posting silly, nonsensical chatter that is “satirically” imputed to a member of the California Bar who happened to have the ill-luck to represent a client called “FunnyJunk.com” in an Internet dustup over cartoons copied from a website called “TheOatmeal.com.” Defendant is not a public figure, no issue of public importance has been addressed, and the matter has not been found newsworthy except in online publications desperate for pseudo-legal content.

Even the racist caricatures published by the Ku Klux Klan enjoy First Amendment protection, but that does not grant Klan propagandists an affirmative claim backed with statutory fees against a private citizen. If Congress wanted to arm plaintiff and other caricature-publishers with a claim for relief that would entitle them to statutory fees if anyone dared to impede them in the act of publishing derisive images and statements, it knows how to enact the appropriate law, doubtless with a stylish acronym. Not surprisingly, no such law exists, and Mr. Levy’s plea for this Court to judicially create one will not prevail.

There is nothing sacred in Mr. Levy’s quest, and much that is venal. Discovery should be allowed to learn whether the evils of champerty and maintenance have resurrected themselves under the guise of “public interest litigation.” And defendant should have an opportunity to seek Amicus Briefs from trademark holders who stand to lose from Mr. Levy’s gambit to put them in the crosshairs of any random, disgruntled blogger, turning a USPTO trademark into an invitation to a preemptive declaratory relief lawsuit from which Mr. Levy can mint a small fortune in fees.

Accordingly, defendant’s request for an extension of time should be granted, and briefing rescheduled appropriately.

Dated: January 26, 2013

CHARLES CARREON, ESQ.
Attorney pro se for defendant
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sign on My Front Door: "Inauthentic people, use service, entrance, please." Is that haughty, enough? Because certainly none of these people could be our friends. Some people, they just don't want to love, then they want to bring your relationship down to their level. Except, I'm not interested in relating to people who consider, for example, politeness and consideration to be a bourgeouis concept. They gotta have that looseness in the system, that allows them to bow out whenever they want, when you've totally committed yourself, spent all day cleaning, and buying groceries, cooking the dinner, table set for three, really looking forward to their visit, going over all the things you're going to say to them when they get here, and find out they sent you an email at 1:00 saying they weren't coming. You were too busy cleaning, shopping and making dinner to read your email. And they've done this to you several times before. Which is why you don't trust them.

There's the people who care, and those who, "if you love them, just let them be free." Well, go be free, motherfuckers. Just stay away from me. I don't care if you are really intelligent and creative. When I let you in the door, I want to have a lifelong relationship. You have to know how to give and share, also, pull your own weight. Preferably (1 in a billion) not be part of any established, recognizable group or philosophy. Not have that communist idea that what's mine is yours, so it doesn't require any thank yous. Quite different from the Indian belief that to say "thank you," is to expect that I'm got going to give you. What an insult! Of course I'm going to share.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tara Carreon
Veteran


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 994
Location: Tucson, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, apparently the big stinking pile of shit at the center of this whole thing -- besides the big shit himself, Matt Inman, who has managed to get everyone involved in his stupid little drama life, -- is Kenneth Paul White and his libertarian lawyer crowd, along with all their dumbshit young male readers. These young male readers don't know anything about the law, but they hate lawyers, except for those lawyers who kiss up to their ignorance like Kenneth Paul White and Paul Levy, who understand that they can use these dummies as patsies for their own political agenda if they pay all the costs and provide all the Protection. Recouvreur got the email from Register.com at midnight saying they were going to expose his name and address as the owner of Charles-Carreon.com, and he was OUTRAGED. Of course he should be able to say nasty shit about someone anonymously, having his ass protected, while he fully exposes his enemy's ass. Sure, that's fair! That's what the First Amendment is for! And I'm sure God himself would defend his sacred right to anonymity and foul speech. He immediately wrote an email to his good friend Kenneth Paul White, who is responsible for whipping people up to this type of rage, who within just a few early morning hours, got his friend at Public Citizen, Paul Levy, to represent Recouvreur in his Rapeutation Crusade against Charles Carreon. Apparently Paul Levy and Public Citizen is Kenneth Paul White's bitch. Public Citizen's real client here is not Recouvreur but Kenneth Paul White IMHO. They do his libertarian white-collar criminal nasty rapeutation bidding. They sue to protect people's right to say unjustified, prejudiced, uninformed, nasty shit about people anonymously, supposedly under the First Amendment, a right which the Court itself did not honor when Recouvreur filed his complaint anonymously, and immediately demanded his name. Recouvreur is going to tell truth to the people about the big, bad lawyer Charles Carreon threatening his sadistic hero, Matt Inman, with a lawsuit for telling lies about Funny Junk, -- that being everyone in this crowd's business, talking nasty shit about people -- but he can't remember those first few hours of passion when he got the notification from Register.com about revealing his name, and he wrote the email to Kenneth Paul White, and then -- BIG MEMORY BLANK FOR THE MAJOR QUESTION OF THE DEPO -- [NOT! Even though he is a big lump with no intellect, which is why Levy demanded a protective order re video depo so no one could see how ugly Recouvreur is] -- he can't remember if he called Paul Levy or Paul Levy called him. Obviously, Paul Levy called him, and he's telling his client to lie about not remembering who called who, to protect his own sorry ass, it being a violation of New York ethics law to first contact a client.

There is obviously nothing good about Public Citizen with Paul Levy at the helm -- a nasty screecher whose voice is like fingernails on a chalkboard -- Charles! Charles! I already told you, Charles! (endless expensive lectures on Charles' dime) -- attacking the lawyer protecting the person who is promoting Ralph Nader and free speech libraries, conspiring with Kenneth Paul White, who Paul Levy now admits under court order is "part of the legal team." He has no true public interest vision. Over 200 emails have passed between Recouvreur and Kenneth Paul White in this case, while Public Citizen is the front man, hiding Kenneth Paul White behind their supposed Public Citizen elitest majesty. They the great big butt-fucking kahunas, Charles the rebel lawyer punk who doesn't want to get butt-fucked, like a Marine who doesn't want to cooperate with Kissinger's butt-fucking plan. http://www.naderlibrary.com/littlemovie.mrs.griggstranscript.htm . These Inman-Kenneth Paul White people are always talking about "butt-hurt," like getting butt-fucked is funny. My father-in-law told me a story once about a guy in prison who got raped, and the next day he picked up a baseball bat and knocked the guy's head off. He said, "And in this way, one man ended two lives," because the guy would have gotten out of prison at some point, but instead he became a murderer.

Charles is not part of the elitest butt-fucking club. http://www.naderlibrary.com/franklincoveruptoc.htm. He defends wives, women and mothers, and people's right to free libraries on the Internet, apparently something to which Public Citizen is firmly opposed, being on Penguin and the Publishers' side. Penguin has a deeply misogynistic agenda. They would have it that no wife has any money or projects that she can call her own. And that whatever she does full-time without pay, is meaningless, and she disappears into her husband. They would have it that the wife and husband are totally One, meaning only the husband exists. They don't even respect the concept of community property. Women and wives are NOTHING. Only money counts, even when money is not the issue, but rather, Content. So Public Citizen is also supporting this same misogynistic agenda by attacking the lawyer representing American Buddha Online Library and its female owner. They are obviously in cahoots with Penguin: Penguin against Tara on the East Coast; Public Citizen against Charles on the West Coast, both at the same time. Coincidence? I don't think so.

Who is that man behind the curtain? Oh, that's nobody, just white-collar criminal lawyer Kenneth Paul White, who defends people who steal from the elderly and the American people at large.

Why is Public Citizen promoting a libertarian agenda, which is nothing but anarchist Republican?


Robert Anton Wilson wrote:
"I dreamed I called Adolf Hitler on the phone and asked him, 'What was your gimmick?' 'They believed it was wiser to obey anyone, even me, than to risk anarchy,' he said with a ghoulish laugh. And the line went dead with a sharp click like boot-heels snapped together."


Meaning, Hitler needs anarchists -- like Robert Anton Wilson and his acolyte Kenneth Paul White -- which he creates and funds, and then pretends to fight, fight, fight but never really overcomes. Like the CIA and al Qaeda.


Up Against the Wall Anarchist Motherfuckers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display replies from:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nader Library Forum Index -> Wild In The Streets! All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
Page 19 of 22

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group