Remembering the Truth of 9/11

[Tara Carreon]

[Tara Carreon]

EXPLOSIVE Evidence Cont'd.

World Trade Center -- Twin Towers

9: Experts Agree

[Roland Angle, P.E., Civil Engineer] And our whole society is being led to believe that these fundamental laws of physics, hard science, don't apply anymore. I think that should really frighten all of us.

[Jonathan Smolens, P.E., Structural Engineer] Just all the other evidence of seeing flashes, and explosions, and the melted metal, and the dust particles, with the explosive chemicals found in the debris -- there's just a lot of questions about what's been going on. And that these questions have not been answered or even addressed in any sort of full way.

[Rick Fowlkes, P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer] My name is Rick Fowlkes. I'm a structural engineer with over 40 years experience in engineering. I'm the president of my own engineering business here in Arizona since 1983. Prior to that, I was a vice president with prominent engineering firms in the Phoenix area. I have experience designing large structures, including power plant structures, shopping center structures, schools, commercial buildings -- you name it. I know structural design, and I know that on September 11th, when I saw those Twin Towers coming down, I knew there had to be more to the story than just a fire causing those failures. It had to be a controlled demolition that we were witnessing. The government has lied to us, and we need to get to the truth. Those victims deserve the truth. They deserve justice. What we have right now is a travesty of justice.

[Anthony Szamboti, B.S.M.E., Mechanical Engineer] The Freedom of Information Act request to NIST by a registered structural engineer for calculations and analysis substantiating the walk-off failures of the horizontal girders from their seats at column 79 and 81, was denied by NIST with the claim that releasing this data "might jeopardize public safety." How could it possibly jeopardize public safety to tell people in the industry, engineers who are responsible for designing these buildings, how this failure could occur?

[Ronald Brookman, S.E., Structural Engineer] That implies that anybody who requests or demands these calculations, is a threat to public safety.

[Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., Professor, University of MA] Science is never secret when it's done right. Science is a way of finding out that is self-correcting, and involves many people. Science isn't science unless it's published, unless it's openly published and made available for criticism. The thing that's most important about science is that it's a way of knowing. And it's a way of knowing that anyone can participate in. At the end of any kind of science activity, people will agree that they have collected evidence that illustrates a hypothesis. And if the evidence is contradictory to the hypothesis, one has to abandon that hypothesis and look for another one.

[Joel Miller, High-Rise Architect] The explanations from FEMA and from NIST don't add up. But there is enormous circumstantial evidence, circumstantial and actually physical evidence as well, that would lead us to a different conclusion. And the conclusion is controlled demolition.

[Richard Humenn, P.E., Original WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer] It was a shame that after the collapse, that a forensic engineering unit didn't go into the debris and try to find at that time why the towers had collapsed. I'm sure there was other evidence that could have given a better indication at the time that there was something else wrong.

[David Chandler, M.S., B.S. Physics, M.A. Education, M.S. Mathematics] Any honest investigator will be looking at this, and looking for explosives and so forth. The NIST investigation didn't go there. They just would not look for explosives. There have been explosives found in the dust, in the debris, but this has been the work of independent researchers, not NIST.

[Jerry Lobdill, B.S.Ch.E., Physicist/Chemical Engineer] And the physical chemistry of everything that I wrote about is consistent with no other hypothesis. And all the testimony of eyewitnesses, all of the video evidence, supports only controlled demolition as the cause of all three World Trade Center buildings' destruction.

[David Gregg, Ph.D., Chemical Engineer] You don't have to be a chemical engineer to question the official story. It's very, very obvious. Both Building Seven and the Towers were brought down by demolition. There couldn't have been any other possible way.

[Roland Angle, P.E., Civil Engineer] That conclusion I come to based upon, first of all, my training and my education, but particularly my experience in blowing up major structures that had been designed to withstand blasts. The experience that I had gained in the military and as an engineer, was irrefutable that those buildings were brought down by explosives.

[Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., Professor, University of MA] So the pre-conceived notion of NIST is that there is no evidence for explosives, and so there's no point in looking. That is the most unscientific thing that you can possibly think of, not to look because you don't expect to find evidence. And in fact, the evidence is overwhelming. They state these conclusions for which there is virtually no evidence, and then they ignore conclusions that could be drawn from the evidence.

[Steve Luce, Former U.S. Army Combat Engineer, Explosive Demolition of Structures] It is my opinion, as a former 12 Bravo Combat Engineer, well-trained in the use of explosives, that this building, all three buildings, were brought down as a result of controlled demolition.

[Richard Humenn, P.E., Original WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer] Elevator company personnel had 24/7 access to the shaft switches, the normal time, in the evening or early morning hours when they perform their maintenance. And of course, their access to the elevator shafts gave them total access to the surrounding core columns, the interior of the core columns.

[David Chandler, M.S., B.S. Physics, M.A. Education, M.S. Mathematics] It took some kind of consciousness-raising on my part before I was willing to look at the possibilities. And really, you need to go where the evidence leads.

[Dr. Robert Bowman, Lt. Col. USAF, Ret., Director -- Advanced Space Programs Development Ford, Carter Administrations] We know we've been lied to about 9/11. We don't know for sure who did it. We don't know exactly how they did everything. And that's why we need a new investigation to find out. But in the meantime, there are things we do know. We do know that there was a massive cover-up, that there was evidence hidden and destroyed.

[Tara Carreon]

EXPLOSIVE Evidence Cont'd.

World Trade Center -- Twin Towers

10: The Next Logical Step

[Richard Gage, AIA] And given these conclusions, what remedy do these professionals recommend?

[Niels Harrit, Ph.D. Chemistry, Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Copenhagen] The three skyscrapers were taken down in controlled demolition, and all we are asking for is a new investigation, and that NIST also will investigate the dust for remaining explosives.

[Erik Lawyer, Firefighter] At Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, what we're asking for is we're asking for an investigation that follows national standards.

[Jody Gibbs, licensed for general building, heavy construction and architecture, Harvard Graduate School of Design, Yale Graduate School of Art & Architecture, Adjunct Faculty at MIT Graduate School of Architecture] I'm Jody Gibbs. I was licensed for general building and heavy construction as well as architecture over 35 years ago. I was educated at Yale University, the Harvard Graduate School of Design, the Yale Graduate School of Art and Architecture, and I taught at MIT as an adjunct faculty for a number of years in the Graduate School of Architecture. My reasons for looking, and demanding, and in urging people to see that we get a judicial investigation, are really very simple: no high rise steel structure has ever been destroyed by a fire in the history of construction. We have eyewitness testimony of firemen, policemen, news reporters, and occupants of the buildings to explosions -- an enormous number of eyewitness testimony. Fourth, the buildings fall at a speed which can only occur if the vertical structure has been removed. We also now have the evidence of thermite and thermate explosives. Most of these things were not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. It's for this reason that I urge all architects and engineers to look into the matter, look at the evidence that is available, and sign on to the demands of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in demanding that we get a judicial investigation.

[Robert E. McCoy, High-Rise Architect] I signed the petition for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth because I felt it was an organization trying to get at the truth of what in fact actually happened, what brought those buildings down. So what I'm looking for is a new investigation where all of the original information and tests and hypotheses are reexamined, as well as the ones that have surfaced since -- the new ones -- including the allegations of controlled demolition.

[Leslie Young, High-Rise Architect] I don't think any of us are pointing fingers at this time. We're just saying, let's reopen it; let's look at it objectively; let's look at the evidence -- not these fabricated computer models, and hearsay, and all these predetermined conclusions. Let's really open it up again, and investigate this thing properly. And then come to conclusions.

[Steven Dusterwald, P.E., Structural Engineer] In my 37 years of experience as a structural engineer, I've never seen modes of failure such as have been exhibited in the case of these buildings. And that's why I feel we need a new independent investigation to explain the destruction of these three buildings.

[Scott Grainger, P.E., Forensic Fire Protection Engineer] I strongly support an independent investigation into what actually occurred. There are many problems. And in fact, as a forensic engineer, I can tell you that unfortunately the government has destroyed much of the evidence, though we could do an appropriate investigation, and an investigation could be done that would be independent of the government, independent of all the influences that were obviously in effect during the NIST investigation.

[Casey Pfieffer, S.E., Structural Engineer] Based on the evidence available, I feel that we must demand a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center towers and NIST itself.

[David Topete, S.E., Structural Engineer] We need to have an investigation of NIST themselves. I believe that the reports that came out are not true. I believe that there was a lot of information that was omitted blatantly or otherwise.

[Richard Humenn, P.E., Original WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer] I strongly feel that an international commission should be formed to look at this matter in an unbiased manner, and come to a conclusion that could be presented to the entire engineering community.

[Roland Angle, P.E., Civil Engineer] We have a professional responsibility, and I urge every engineer, and architect, and demolitions expert, and anybody who has any knowledge in this field, to examine the evidence, and stand up and be counted, because the rest of the world is depending upon us.

[David Chandler, M.S., B.S. Physics, M.A. Education, M.S. Mathematics] I would like to see a real investigation. I'd like to see people on the inside, who really know what happened. I'd like to see some of those come out. There are some very good scientists, I'm sure at NIST, and their life's work is getting distorted and used for political purposes.

[Steve Luce, Former U.S. Army Combat Engineer, Explosive Demolition of Structures] What happened on 9/11 is not something that is just going to go away. This is very pertinent to us today. I wish to further the investigation, and I want to make a difference, because I want this to be a safe and better place for my children.

[Leslie Young, High-Rise Architect] I signed the petition on the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth website mainly because I wanted to stand behind the families that lost people on 9/11. The 9/11 Truth Movement was started by the families that lost loved ones on that day. And they were all out there alone, screaming for help, and our own country was ignoring them, ignoring their needs, and not taking care of them the way we should have after that happened.

[Rick Fowlkes, P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer] We have not been told the truth. We deserve the truth, and so do the victims.

[Leslie Young, High-Rise Architect] We need to come together again as a country. I believe that this one event split our country in half. And the only way we are going to come back together is to reopen the wound, and talk about this in an open dialogue.

[Tara Carreon]

EXPLOSIVE Evidence Cont'd.

Seeking Understanding

9/11: Coming to Terms

[Richard Gage, AIA] Most of us who have lived with the events of 9/11 have, as a result, experienced some kind of trauma. It can be very difficult to come to terms with what actually happened at the World Trade Center. In fact, someone told me recently, "I wouldn't believe what you're telling me even if it were true." Our petition-signers with psychological expertise have stepped forward to offer their insight. While this segment is clearly outside the knowledge-base of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, these experts in psychology highlight their valuable experience for us as to why this evidence can still be so difficult for people to accept.

[Marti Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] At this point, we have 9 years of hard scientific evidence that disproves the government theory about what happened on September 11th, and yet people continue to be either oblivious to the fact that this information exists, or completely resistant to looking at this information. So the question becomes "Why? Why is it that people have so much trouble hearing this information?" From my work, I think we would be remiss not to look at the impact of trauma. My name is Marti Hopper, and I'm a Ph.D. Clinical Psychologist. I've been working and living for the past 30 years here in Boulder, Colorado. For the past 11 years, my work has focused on helping people who have experienced personal trauma. Now as we know, the horrors of what happened on 9/11 were televised all over the world, and they were televised, in fact, live. We witnessed the deaths of almost 3,000 of our fellow Americans. We know this had a very severe and traumatic impact on a large majority of the population. I myself cried for weeks after September 11th. A friend of mine, who is a psychologist in practice here in Boulder, said that her caseload increased tremendously after 9/11, and people she hadn't seen in 10 years were coming back into her practice. So I think it's safe to say that collectively as a nation, because of what happened on September 11th, we experienced trauma.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] I'm Fran Shure, and I have a bachelors degree from the University of Colorado. I've had a private practice as a psychotherapist and as a licensed professional counselor for about 20 years. Why do people resist this information, the information that shows that the official story about 9/11 cannot be true? What I've learned is that as humans, each of us has a worldview. And that worldview is usually formed, in great part, by the culture we grow up in. When we hear information that contradicts our worldviews, social psychologists call the resulting insecurity "cognitive dissonance." For example, with 9/11, we have one cognition which is what the official story of 9/11, what our government told us, what our media repeated to us, over and over, that 19 Muslims attacked us. On the other hand, we have what scientists, researchers, architects, and engineers are now beginning to tell us, which is that there is evidence that shows that the official story cannot be true. So now we've lost our sense of security. We are starting to feel vulnerable. Now we're confused.

[Robert Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] 9/11 Truth challenges some of our most fundamental beliefs about our government, and about our country. When your beliefs are challenged, or when two beliefs are inconsistent, cognitive dissonance is created. 9/11 Truth challenges the beliefs that our country protects us and keeps us safe, and that America is the good guy. My name is Bob Hopper, and I have a Ph.D. in clinical psychology from the University of Cincinnati. For the past 29 years, I've been a licensed Ph.D. clinical psychologist in Boulder, Colorado. When your beliefs are challenged, fear and anxiety are created. In response to that, our psychological defenses kick in, and they protect us from these emotions. Denial, which is probably the most primitive psychological defense, is the one most likely to kick in when our beliefs are challenged.

[Danielle Duperet, Ph.D.] I'm Danielle Duperet, Ph.D. I'm originally from Switzerland where I studied psychology and psychoanalysis. For the past 15 years I've been empowering people who have experienced significant trauma. America is a powerful nation. It has never been attacked. We were confident; we felt secure; and all of a sudden that security collapsed. People started to be fearful with all those rumors, those news. People didn't know what to think about. And it's a very, very uncomfortable state to be in. And eventually our mind shuts off, just like when a computer is overloaded, our minds get overloaded. We can't handle it anymore and we shut down. It's easier to deny it and move on with our lives.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] What some of us will tend to do is deny the evidence that's coming our way, and stick to the original story, the official story, and try to regain our equilibrium in that way. Another thing we can do is decide to look at the conflicting evidence, and be sincere and be open-minded, and look at both sides of the issue, and then make up our own mind about what reality is.

[Dorothy Lorig, M.A.] I'm Dorothy Lorig. I have a masters degree in counseling psychology from the University of Colorado. And I've been practicing reevaluation counseling for over 16 years. If we can think of our worldview as being sort of our mental and emotional home, I think most of us would do about anything to defend our homes, and defend our families. And so I see that with people. And I saw that with myself when my brother tried to talk with me about it of, "Don't mess with me; don't mess with my home; don't mess with my comfort with how things are." About a week later I read a lengthy article by Professor Griffin about why he believes the official account of 9/11 cannot be true, and it was a very well-researched article, and I was in my office at the time. And I sat there and I felt my stomach churning. I thought maybe I was going to be sick. And I leaped out of my chair and ran out the door and took a long walk around the block -- around several blocks -- and just broke down. I understand now that what was happening was my worldview about my government being in some way my protector, almost like a parent, had been dashed, and it was like being cast out into the wilderness, I think that is the closest way to describe that feeling. And I sobbed and I sobbed. I felt like the ground had completely disappeared beneath my feet. And I knew at some point during the walk that I was going to have to become active in educating other people about this, that for me to retain any sense of integrity, I was going to have to take some action. I couldn't just let something like this go.

[Robert Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] Many people respond to these truths in a very deep way. Some have a visceral reaction like they've been punched in the stomach. To begin to accept the possibility that the government was involved, is like opening Pandora's box. If you open the lid, and peek in a little bit, it's going to challenge some of your fundamental beliefs about the world.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] Here are some of those spontaneous initial reactions to hearing the contradictory evidence about 9/11:

[Robert Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] "I don't want to know the truth or I'd become too negative and psychologically go downhill." "I'm not sure I want to know. If this is true, then up would be down and down would be up. My life would never be the same."

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] "Fran, I refuse to believe that that many Americans could be that treasonous. Someone would have talked." But these are beliefs; they are not scientific facts. But these beliefs do keep us from looking at the empirical evidence.

[David Ray Griffin, Ph.D., Professor/Author] I'm David Ray Griffin. I taught philosophy of religion and theology at the Claremont School of Theology, and Claremont Graduate University. I published about 35 books in my field. But then, starting in 2004, I started publishing about 9/11, and since that time I have published 10 books about 9/11. You have empirical people who will simply say, "Look at the evidence, and if it's convincing, I will change my mind." Other people are paradigmatic people. They have a paradigm. They say, "This is the way the world works, and I'm convinced this is the right way the world works. 9/11 doesn't fit into that paradigm. So I don't need to look at the evidence. It's paradigmatic." And then there's a third type of person that we often call "wishful thinkers." I call it "wishful and fearful thinking." So they simply will not believe something that they fear to be the truth. And I have found that maybe to be the most powerful factor of people rejecting the 9/11 truth, and not even entertaining the evidence.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] So whenever we say, "I refuse to believe," we can be sure that the evidence that's coming our way is not bearable, and that it's conflicting with our worldview much too much.

[Robert Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] Denial protects people from this kind of anxiety.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] As I thought about all of these responses, I realized that what is common to every one of them is the emotion of fear. People are afraid of being ostracized; they're afraid of being alienated; they're afraid of being shunned; they're afraid of their lives being inconvenienced; they'd have to change their lives; they're afraid of being confused; they're afraid of psychological deterioration; they're afraid of feeling helpless and vulnerable; and they're afraid they won't be able to handle the feelings that are coming up. And none of us want to feel helpless and vulnerable, so we want to defend ourselves. And the way we often do that is with anger. So then we become angry. And when we become angry, then we become indignant; we become offended; we want to ridicule the messenger; we want to pathologize the messenger; and we want to censor the messenger.

[Robert Hopper, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist] So how can we overcome this resistance and denial? The first thing is to meet people where they're at.

[John Freedom, M.A., Personal Development Counselor] One thing is we need to raise people's awareness about this through what I would call "gentle dialogue," and "gentle questioning." My name is John Freedom. I'm a counselor in private practice here in Tucson, Arizona, which I've been in for the past 20 years. I hold a masters level certification in NLP, which is neurolinguistic programming. So it doesn't work to challenge people's belief, or immediately tell them, "I know the truth about 9/11." But a good way is to ask questions, ask open-ended questions, and lead them into a dialogue and discussion about it.

[William Woodward, Ph.D., M.A. - Experimental Psychology] Healing comes through facing the truth, experiencing it, allowing the feelings to come in so that if there are feelings of fear that perhaps these events were caused by something we haven't thought about yet, dark elements within our society, for example, we let that come in and explore it. Let the light shine on whatever happened. This will be the most healing process. The Germans did this after their war. The South Africans did this after apartheid. Reconciliation through the truth is a deep path to psychological recovery from the myths and lies around which this historic event has been cloaked in the official view. I am Professor William Woodward. I'm trained in the history of science with a Ph.D. I also have a masters in experimental psychology. I have edited four books, and published well over 20 peer-reviewed papers. I've taught for 35 years at a state university, the University of New Hampshire. I think, as a psychologist, to overcome our fear of the traumatic event with new information would be the best, healthiest route to our collective recovery from the trauma of 9/11. That, by the way, is a psychotherapeutic insight that to gradually uncover the truth in your own life, the sources of anxiety, to make them conscious, is the royal road to recovery.

[Danielle Duperet, Ph.D.] One of the ways to deal with a trauma is to find the answers. That's why I think it is of such importance to have a comprehensive investigation.

[William Woodward, Ph.D., M.A. - Experimental Psychology] To work together to expose what happened, regardless of where the evidence takes us -- that's what we expect in our state government, and law enforcement. I think that by putting science together with the law, we'll have a psychological healing around the impossible cognitions that had been produced on that day.

[Robert Griffin, Licensed Psychologist] I believe that to be the kind of country that we think we are, we have to face some of the things that are not as we think they are. I am Robert Griffin. I am a licensed psychologist practicing in Pennsylvania for 25 years. I am a member of Psychologists for Social Responsibility. And I am past president of the Northeastern Pennsylvania Psychological Association. After World War II, part of the way that Jewish people honored the dead was by making sure that the truth was known, and that the value of these people was respected. Not pursuing the truth about 9/11 disrespects the value of the lives of the people that died. Thinking that we're above such things, that it could happen in other countries but it couldn't happen here -- that's a lack of humility. And that's excessive pride. And so not being able to see our dark side, or our weaknesses, is the most dangerous thing.

[David Ray Griffin, Ph.D., Professor/Author] The observation that pride is one of the basic human flaws, is absolutely correct. This is especially true for Americans because we, for a long time, looked at other nations and said, "Oh, they're in such bad shape, but luckily we don't have those problems. We don't have leaders who would do those things that were done in the Soviet Union, or done in Germany, or done in Japan," and on down the list. So this is a type of pride that Americans have. A feature of American history that makes us particularly liable to this pride is this notion of, it's called "exceptionalism," that America is the "exceptional" nation. And that began from the beginning as this country was formed. The people would say, "Well, there was so much evil in the European countries, so much cheating, so much lying, so much using the people for the rulers' purposes, but not in America. We have leaders who are free from those sins." So I think this has made 9/11 particularly difficult for Americans.

[Robert Griffin, Licensed Psychologist] Anyone can make mistakes, but our ideals and our principles get us back on track.

[John Freedom, M.A., Personal Development Counselor] This is one of the defining issues of our time.

[Robert Griffin, Licensed Psychologist] So we need to understand that questioning is patriotic. Questioning is what we're supposed to do as citizens. That's our duty.

[Frances Shure, M.A., Licensed Professional Counselor] When we come to the national level, when something like 9/11 happens, we need to be sure that we have a real investigation into who the perpetrators are. And then we need to be sure that those perpetrators are held legally accountable. It's part of the healing process on the individual level, as on the collective level. We need the truth in order to heal.

[Tara Carreon]

EXPLOSIVE Evidence Cont'd and Finished

Seeking Understanding

9/11: Too Close to Home

[Richard Gage, AIA] Ten years later, the deep wounds from 9/11 have yet to heal. Nothing hits closer to home than the loss that these family members continue to endure, along with the torment of their unanswered questions.

[Bob McIlvaine, Lost Son, Bobby on 9/11] My name's Bob McIlvaine. I'm from right outside the Philadelphia area. And I'm the father of Bobby McIlvaine, who was killed in the lobby of the North Tower on September 11, 2001. But I've been searching to get the truth of exactly what happened to Bobby. And Bobby is a very interesting story. Bobby was one of the first ten bodies found. We took him home that week. Well, I finally found the doctor who examined him. He gave me an outline of a body, and he described all the injuries he had. But the fact is, that all his injuries were in the face, the front of his face: his face was blown off; massive cuts in his chest, and his right arm were blown off. To me, that means explosion.

[Michelle Little, Lost brother David M. Weiss, FDNY on 9/11] My brother was my best friend. David has always been a firefighter. My brother went in to save people's lives. I'm a family member trying to find out the answers to the murder of 3,000 plus people.

[Jane Pollicino, Lost husband Steve, on 9/11] I'm Jane Pollicino. My husband Steve was 48 years old when he was killed on September 11th. I have no identification. Why is that? And you're sort of left with all these question marks, which is harder to deal with than the pain of losing somebody in that way. It seems to me we should know why over 1,000 victims there are no trace for, and no identification -- no trace of over 1,000 victims.

[Michelle Little, Lost brother David M. Weiss, FDNY on 9/11] Just a few years ago they were still finding body parts on the roofs of buildings. What is that?

[Jane Pollicino, Lost husband Steve, on 9/11] We should know why there are over 700 bone fragments found on the top of Deutsche Bank Building less than 1/2 inch long. We should have that information. Why were they up there? Why weren't they found? What kind of explosion was there?

[Bob McIlvaine, Lost Son, Bobby on 9/11] And the explosions were brought up many times, talking to firemen, talking to medics, talking to everyone -- everybody talked about these explosions.

[Jane Pollicino, Lost husband Steve, on 9/11] I want the officials that are in power to ask the questions. I want answers. We never had answers. Nobody ever stopped to have a scientific investigation.

[Bob McIlvaine, Lost Son, Bobby on 9/11] Please look at Architects & Engineers. People all around the world, scientists all around the world, are questioning this, that these towers could not have come down. But when you bring science into the equation, that's so important. Because you can't argue against science. And there's some deep, deep explaining to do.

[Michelle Little, Lost brother David M. Weiss, FDNY on 9/11] The bottom line is that it needs to be investigated properly.

[Richard Gage, AIA] The forensic evidence that you've seen is very real. New light has been shown. A third beam now reaches into the pitch-black sky, and stands in for the still officially unexplained freefall destruction of the World Trade Center Building Seven. The obvious dark truth about Building Seven may very well provide the key to justice for the victims of the destruction of the Twin Towers.

[Jane Pollicino, Lost husband Steve, on 9/11] The country owns this. We're all victims. We all should want answers. It's not just ours; it's not just mine; we all lost something that day.

9/11: EXPLOSIVE Evidence
Experts Speak Out

Executive Producer
Richard Gage, AIA

Video Team Leader
Charles Ewing Smith

Produced and Edited by
Francis Battaglia
Michael Green
Martin McGee
Charles Ewing Smith

Scripted and Edited by
Richard Gage, AIA
Gregg Roberts
Brian Good
Chris Sarns
Susie Bonham-Craig

Assistant Editors
Nathan Flach
Steven Dusterwald
Dan Noel
Frances Shure
Sean Brizendine

Videography
Martin McGee
Ken Jenkins
David Weisman

Sound Editor
Charles Ewing Smith

Animation
Chris Healer / Molecule, Inc.

Interview Coordinators
Mark Phillips
Martin McGee
Tania Torres
Francis Shure
Darcy Wearing
Merri-Sue Clark
Kay Stewart

Transcription
Chris Soppet
Ruth Elkin
Brian Good
Martin Weir
Joe Ciolino

In Memory of
David Gregg, Ph.D.
Shane Geiger
Danny Jowenko

Special thanks to all of our experts, 9/11 family members, donors and volunteers at AE911Truth

For more information
AE911Truth.org

[Tara Carreon]

Small companion plane to Rumsfeld's doomsday plane at Shanksville before the so-called "crash" of Flight 93?

[Tara Carreon]

Rumsfeld's doomsday plane at the White House before the Pentagon is struck.

[Tara Carreon]

Many white planes at Shanksville.