| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:18 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I really feel for the world right now, and especially young people, but all people, really, because of the psychological warfare that's constantly directed at all of us. People are so very, very vulnerable to peer pressure. They want to be liked; they don't want their societies to diss them; especially they don't want to be targeted by the media for total ruination of their lives. And in order for the psychological warfare to proceed, the cannibals that run our society need sacrificial victims. In this case, it's Funnyjunk and Charles Carreon's family. It's not the first time we've been targeted as sacrificial victims. We were targeted by the entire Buddhist community when I told them to go fuck themselves, for being nihilists, elitists, and authoritarians. Seeing what happens to people who buck the group mind-think, makes people fearful of what could happen to them if they didn't do what they were told. In this way, everyone is made to support the status quo, i.e., the Conservatives.
So I want to tell everyone who is fearful of stepping outside the group mind-think, afraid of being an individual, and thinking for themselves, that it is better to do the right thing than the group thing. What do you need your peers' approval for? So you can get stuck in a group prison with everyone else? So you can despise yourself for being weak and vulnerable? And be prevented from doing your part to keep the world from going to hell? And not step in to lend a hand when someone is being abused?
Better to tell your friends to go to hell, and have some dignity and self-worth, and be free to act as you want, according to your conscience. I get a lot of comfort from thinking about what Ralph Nader has been through over the years. The media tried to rip him a new asshole many a time. They wanted him to crawl into a hole and die. Fascist fuckers! Fuck them! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pretty soon they'll be denying us discovery for national security reasons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
It appears that the entire national security state is being mobilized for Matt Inman.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's some sane reporting that does not make Matt Inman look good. No ordinary person is going to like his bullshit.
Thank you, Matthias Gafni, of the Contra Costa Times, for reporting this story fairly.
| MercuryNews.com, Matthias Gafni wrote: | The Oatmeal website, cancer and wildlife charities sued following web feud involving bear bestiality fundraiser
By Matthias Gafni Contra Costa Timescontracostatimes.com
Posted: 06/22/2012 05:12:10 PM PDT
June 23, 2012 1:3 AM GMTUpdated: 06/22/2012 06:03:08 PM PDT
Charles Carreon (Courtesy of Charles Carreon)
mgafni@bayareanewsgroup.com
What do you get when you mix a lawyer, a popular comic website, copyright infringement allegations and a fundraising effort starring the attorney's mom and a Kodiak bear?
A lawsuit, of course.
Charles Carreon, an internet attorney who gained notoriety during the web's infancy litigating over the domain rights to sex.com, sued The Oatmeal last week, claiming his squabble with the popular humor site has incited "cyberterrorism" against himself, in the form of hackers infiltrating his website, a phantom Twitter account under his name antagonizing people and unsolicited subscriptions to porn sites.
Caught up in the 56-year-old's lawsuit filed June 15 in San Francisco federal court are Matthew Inman, creator of the The Oatmeal; Indiegogo, a San Francisco website that helps people raise money online; and the American Cancer Society and National Wildlife Federation.
Including the charities in the lawsuit has particularly enraged a legion of fans of The Oatmeal, already upset that Carreon brought an internet feud to the halls of justice.
The web kerfuffle in a nutshell?
A year ago, Inman claimed he found some of his comics posted on Funny Junk -- a website that aggregates humorous material -- without crediting or linking them to The Oatmeal. On his blog, a frustrated Inman asked readers what he should do about it, saying cease and desist letters were not effective. He summarized Funny Junk's business model saying they slather funny pictures accumulated from around the internet, collect "six figure advertising checks from other artists' stolen material," and "If someone claims copyright infringement, throw your hands up in the air and exclaim 'It was our users who uploaded your photos! We had nothing to do with it! We're innocent!' "
Fast forward to June 2, when Carreon, on behalf of Funny Junk, wrote Inman demanding he take down the blog post accusing his client of copyright infringement and pay $20,000 to make up for lost advertising revenue.
Carreon, speaking by phone from his Tucson office, said his client is not a "willful copyright infringer." Funny Junk, by its nature, receives many notices to remove copyrighted materials and they oblige, Carreon said. He helped write the site's policy which makes members promise not to infringe on copyrights and that repeat offenders would be barred. The attorney claimed the $20,000 was used more as a threat and he would have been happy to have the Funny Junk blog post simply taken down.
That didn't happen.
Inman, who depicts himself as a pterodactyl who will "ptero-you a new (expletive)", includes a video of how he handles his enemies on his site.
"In his character as a carnivorous, prehistoric flying reptile that first rips the intestines out of a man's anus, then flogs him with his entrails, then steals a pineapple from a boy, tears his head off, flings it (at) a girl and knocks (her) head off, then grinds up the girl's head up in a wood-chipper, blends it with the pineapple, and drinks the grisly cocktail," Carreon explains in his lawsuit. He adds that Inman's followers embrace his "brutal ideology."
In ptero-style, Inman posted Carreon's letter on his website and said he would not pay the $20,000, but instead raise that amount to be split between the American Cancer Society and National Wildlife Federation, and send the attorney a photograph of the cash along with a drawing of Carreon's mom seducing a kodiak bear. Born was the charity fundraiser dubbed "BearLove Good. Cancer Bad."
In his lawsuit, Carreon described the fundraising logo as a "misogynistic cartoon depicting an obese female dressed in her underwear, with pendulous breasts popping out of her brassiere, an enormous posterior distended by an overstretched thong, rouged cheeks, and a crudely-lipsticked mouth, calling out to an apparently disinterested brown bear half her size, 'COME HURR AND LOVE MEEEE!'"
"Unbeknownst to Mr. Inman, I was very, very attached to my mom," Carreon said by phone, referring to his mother as "a nice Catholic woman" who died in a drowning accident. "It struck a nerve."
"My client came up with this creative, if not funny, way to respond to a legal threat," said Corrine McSherry, intellectual property director with San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation who is representing Inman pro bono. "And I think Mr. Carreon is not happy with the response. Mr. Carreon has been the subject of a great deal of criticism... and none of it is within my client's control."
Meanwhile, the fundraiser quickly surpassed $20,000. It has raised more than $200,000 for the two charities, with donations accepted through Monday.
And that has raised the ire of Carreon, who sued last week to create a trust with the proceeds to make sure the money goes to the two charities and not Inman.
"Of course he's going to give it all to charity," McSherry said. "At the end of the day, what this lawsuit is about is punishing someone engaging in critical speech. That's the core of the lawsuit."
Carreon also asks for damages claiming trademark infringement and incitement of cybervandalism.
Carreon claims someone created a Twitter account with his trademarked name and engaged in "verbal combat" with other Twitter users.
"Don't tell me that's parody. You can't say: '@Nissan Automotive: Fords suck they get bad gas mileage,'" he said. "I have control over my commercial image."
In addition, Carreon has mysteriously been signed up for numerous porn sites, along with people leaving him voicemails pretending to vomit and ordering him pizzas without his knowledge.
"That was truly not innovative," he laughed.
Carreon said he contacted the charities who were unaware of the fundraising effort.
"That explains why there is so much fraudulent fundraising going on because they don't monitor it," Carreon said. "Look, I have no interest in supporting the object of making fun of my mom, but I'm all about giving support to the American Cancer Society and Wildlife Federation."
The San Francisco website hosting the fundraiser discounted the lawsuit.
"As the largest crowdfunding platform operating in nearly 200 countries Indiegogo exists to provide crowdfunding opportunities worldwide," said Slava Rubin, the company's CEO and co-founder, in a released statement, "and a frivolous lawsuit doesn't change Indiegogo's commitment to this creative and popular campaign."
The two charities did not respond to media requests Friday.
Meanwhile, Carreon responded to the criticism that his lawsuit was mere retribution.
"Vengeance against Mr. Inman is something I don't need and I don't want," he said.
Inman's attorney countered:
"The right answer to speech you don't like is more speech, not a lawsuit."
Contact Matthias Gafni at 925-952-5026. Follow him at Twitter.com/mgafni. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ann wrote: | 
Ann • Jun 17, 2012 @5:45 pm As a non-lawyer, may I ask what the chances of his disbarment for this behavior are? It's very frightening for a blogger/writer/social media marketer when an attorney can force you into having to spend money on an attorney, even just to respond to a letter, let alone a suit. His family members are now making threats towards commenters on Twitter and news articles that if they keep criticizing him they will be subpoenaed. It's gone from funny to frightening and tragic. I'd like to blog about the issue, but I also don't have the money to be retaining an attorney if I were to become one of the Does. Advice? |
This is one of the little lying bitches working for Matt Inman, if it's true her name is "Ann," and she's really a girl. "She's" very active on his behalf. I wonder how much he's paying "her." Actually, the person who first threatened was STStone. The "threat" she's referring to "family members" having made is this joke I made back to him that Charles would be subpoenaeing his harddrive to prove that he was a media mole, when he threatened to call Sony Pictures to complain about my Labyrinth screenplay post. "Ann" wants to make it the cause of a Crusade. Poor, little, fearful Ann who is afraid to blog and twitter because of evil people like Tara Carreon. We found out that the person impersonating Charles at Charles-Carreon.com is actually a girl. Is it perhaps "Ann"? If so, "Ann" is definitely going to get sued. She can count on it. But she won't be named as a DOES, rather as a named defendant.
| TechDirt wrote: | STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:42pm
I wonder if Sony Pictures knows you have its intellectual property (in the form of the Labyrinth screenplay) hosted on your site without its permission.
Maybe I should contact the studio and find out.
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:45pm
There's a library exemption to copyright infringement. See the other thread "Carreon continues to lash out."
_____
STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:48pm
There's a library exemption to copyright infringement.
Show me the exact wording in any relevant judicial case or active part of copyright law that creates a "library exemption", and I will believe you.
Until then, you'll have to excuse me -- I need to start finding the email addresses of some major book and film publishers.
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:54pm
I already replied to YOU on the other thread. But I'm happy to repost it here.
***** REPOST FOR RETARD *****
I'll just quote the statute and add a comment and explain how it applies in the online context. Of course, you could have googled "copyright + library" and found it yourself, but that is apparently above your grade level.
17 USC § 108 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives
Current through Pub. L. 112-128. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
" (a) Except as otherwise provided in this title and notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for a library or archives, or any of its employees acting within the scope of their employment, to reproduce no more than one copy or phonorecord of a work, except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), or to distribute such copy or phonorecord, under the conditions specified by this section, if—
(1) the reproduction or distribution is made without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage;
(2) the collections of the library or archives are
(i) open to the public, or
(ii) available not only to researchers affiliated with the library or archives or with the institution of which it is a part, but also to other persons doing research in a specialized field; and
(3) the reproduction or distribution of the work includes a notice of copyright that appears on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section, or includes a legend stating that the work may be protected by copyright if no such notice can be found on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section."
At the American Buddha Online Library (ABOL), we have a notice posted that applies this section to the reproduction of transient digital copies on the user's computer, and voila, we have immunity from copyright infringement liability. No court has ever pronounced on the viability of this theory of copyright infringement immunity, and our legal counsel, Charles Carreon, has thusfar carried the day in defense litigation directed at ABOL by Penguin USA. Litigation is the test, and ABOL has passed it. Theorize in a knowledge vacuum if you are so inclined. In space, no one can hear you bloviate.
_____
STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:58pm
So, basically, you think calling your website a "library" and saying "copyright law doesn't apply to me" will save your ass if a few big name book publishers and movie studios come a-callin' over the fact that you put up their legally-protected works online and tried to circumvent copyright law by calling the site you hosted their works on a "library"?
You might find your husband willing to make the argument for you in court, but any competent attorney would tell you to shut up, take the infringing content down, and pray that those publishers don't seek restitution for your infringment upon copyright law.
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:59pm
Since when did you become a copyright chicken hawk? You probably still have MP3s and movies on your hard drive that you got through illegal file-sharing on Napster, Kaaza, and Pirate Bay, you hypocrite. Better delete all of them right now before Charles subpoenas them to prove that you're a media mole.
_____
STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:04pm
Subpoena me for what -- saying things you don't like?
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:13pm
So far, ABOL has responded to a handful of DMCA notices, to which ABOL has replied with counternotices that have universally been accepted as valid by numerous international publishers, all of whom have accepted the legitimacy of ABOL as a library by taking no further action after the content was reposted. The sole exception to this is Penguin USA, that sued three years ago in the SDNY, was promptly pitched out of court by District Judge Lynch for lack of personal jurisdiction, appealed to the 2nd Circuit, ("American Buddha I") that booted the jurisdictional issue up to the New York Court of Appeals ("American Buddha II"), that sent it back to Judge Koeltl, who is now administering jurisdictional discovery, after which the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction will be renewed, and we anticipate, granted, after American Buddha establishes its pure non-profit bona fides by showing no income.
As an aside, no music publisher or movie studio has ever submitted a DMCA notice. It would seem that the RIAA accepts the library-lending exemption, which is buttressed by a downloading blocker that prevents more than one MP3 from being played at any time by any user, such that it is no different in its operations from the old-fashioned listening booths, i.e., a room with a turntable and a speaker, that were available for years at public libraries before the collapse of informational services at the neighborhood paper bricks and mortar level.
With regard to transcriptions of screenplays and illustrated screencap galleries, American Buddha first became a huge resource in this field with its ground-breaking illustrated screenplay method of presenting Richard Linklater's "Waking Life," and became the go-to-source for students of that seminal post-modern work. Should any question of legal action arise, the statute of limitations, three years for copyright infringement, has long ago expired on virtually all of the motion picture content, since I was most prolific in that field a few years back, and have lately concentrated on archiving rare and otherwise unavailable works such as Jung's recently-published "Red Book," which will not be found outside a few rare-book reading rooms in American libraries. Thanks to my oversized scanner and trusty Dell Quad-Core, students of Jung can have access to this all-important work, that was kept unpublished for many years after his death by his literary executors, which I bought at the first opportunity.
Perhaps it is a mark of your own insufficient self-worth, perhaps due to not giving away enough of your labor, and instead holding forth spitting bile in digital fora, that you speak of things regarding which you have no understanding. Indeed, I will assume this and as a scholar, commend you to your books.
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:17pm
For all of that illegal content on your hard drive. You'll have to seek a protective order to keep your porn stash private. What's your preference -- het, gay, bi, BDSM?
_____
STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:20pm
What law does he plan to subpoena me under? I haven't...
...wait. Did you just vaguely threaten to try and out me to the general public using a subpoena and use that as a tool to embarass and humiliate me?
WOW. You, darling, have sunk lower than your husband.
_____
TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:36pm
"Darling?" Since we're exchanging terms of endearment, let's play a real free speech game. I link you to the ABOL archive of Italian spanking imagery, and to its screencap gallery of the lesbian bondage classic scene from Sexus, original music by Chet Baker, directed by Jose Benazaref, and you tell me which you like better.
"Outing?" That's so pre-Obama! Who could "out" anyone for any sexual proclivity short of pederasty now, and claim any kind of "left" credentials? You're not suggesting something truly outre, are you?
And about the subpoena, JK. I have no control over what Charles does. He's an officer of the court, who would never abuse his authority. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
These little cannibal kids think they're so brave, standing up for the sadist Matt Inman, tearing a good lawyer's name apart, a lawyer who is practically a saint, who has worked for the underprivileged and poor his whole adult life, while they post anonymously. If they're so brave, then why don't they post under their real names, and give us the opportunity to tear their names apart? Put up hate sites using their names? Because in this new fascist "Internet" world we live in, the anonymous people deserve free speech, while those with names, deserve to have their identities destroyed. That is so American -- not!
And -- they hate dolphins! These people are the opposite of "progressive." Like I said, they are our modern-day "Hitler youth," and Matt Inman is their Hitler -- not even the person Hitler, just "Hitler's port-a-potty." And they're proud of it. They think it's funny. They think they can take any racist, bigoted, regressive idea and legitimize it by putting it into a cartoon.
Then, I would say, we really need to watch out for cartoons.
I compare Matt Inman to the cartoonist Al Capp, an evil man who I'm pretty sure was part of the conspiracy to kill John Lennon. He visited him just before he died and ridiculed the hell out of him. Got a big kick out if it, he did.
Charles is like John Lennon.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Al Capp also attacked Joan Baez, another heroine for peace:
| Joan Baez, And a Voice to Sing With wrote: | | Al Capp, creator of the "L'il Abner" comic strip, launched the most imaginative of the negative attacks, introducing a character into his strip called Joanie Phoanie. She was a slovenly, two-faced, showbiz slut, a thinly disguised Commie, who traveled around in a limousine singing "songs of protest against poverty and hunger for $10,000.00 a concert." She put out albums like, If It Sounds Phoanie It's Joanie, which included "Lay Those Weapons Down, McNamara," "Throw Another Draft Card on the Fire!" and "Let's Conga with the Viet Cong." |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Charles and I FOIA'ed Al Capp's FBI documents. Apparently, he worked for the national security state as one of their propagandists, because he had done a bad thing once and was a member of the Communist Party.
| FBI wrote: | UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
[delete]
DATE: 7/2/69
TO: [delete]
FROM: [delete]
SUBJECT: AL CAPP
CARTOONIST
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
[delete]
[delete]
By letter of 6/26/69, our Boston Office submitted a reprinted speech delivered by Al Capp, the well-known cartoonist, at the Franklin Pierce College, Rindge, New Hampshire, on 4/27/69, appearing in the 6/25/69 edition of "The Boston Globe." In his speech, Capp is critical of Harvard University's handling of student agitation and during the speech, takes Harvard Economist John Kenneth Galbraith to task. Also submitted is a "Letter to the Globe from Al Capp" which appeared in the same edition of the Globe. In this letter, Capp alleges that Galbraith in commencement addresses made unfavorable references to both Capp and Mr. Hoover. According to Capp, Galbraith supposedly questioned the right of Capp and the Director to comment on the campus situation since neither had any experience in the field. Capp then largely defends the Director and ends his letter by making reference to the FBI National Academy as a great "graduate" school and states: "No student of Hoover's ever burned his country's flag, beat up his instructors, or screeched obscenities at school the day he graduated."
This material was submitted with the thought that the Director may want to write Mr. Capp thanking him for his favorable comments. [delete]
By letter dated 6/27/69, [delete] secretary to Al Capp, sent, at Mr. Capp's direction, copies of the aforementiond commencement address and letter to the Globe to the Bureau. [delete] expressed gratitude to our Boston Office for its help in furnishing him information regarding the Director.
Both Al Capp (also known as Alfred G. Capplin) and John Kenneth Galbraith are, of course, well-known to the Bureau. In the past, Capp has been praised by the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA) and its publications for some of his comic strips which have implied, among other things, that the American economy was being mismanaged by vicious tycoons, that several persons were converted to outcasts because of questioning concerning them by government investigators and like matters. In 1961, a Congressman criticized Capp for unfair attacks on law enforcement officers in his comic strip, "Li'l Abner," and, that same year, Capp wrote in a column that during the 1930's he was too poor to pay a membership fee in a social club that turned out to be the Young Communist League. He concluded that if he had joined, thirty years later any Congressional Committee would be entitled to call him a traitor and any
Enclosure
1-Mr. DeLoach-Enc
TDH:paa (6)
JUL 9, 1969
CONTINUED -- OVER
investigative agency would be entitled to reject his services to his country. [delete] [delete] admittedly held a position in the CPUSA during the late 1930's. In recent years, Capp has become increasingly conservative in many of his views. In addition to his cartooning, he has become a very active speaker who expresses strong views against student agitation. Galbraith, subject of FBI investigations in 1941, 1950, 1961, and 1965, is widely known as a liberal and one who has been a sharp critic of American foreign policy through his participation in the Americans for a Democratic Action. Our investigations reflect Galbraith was closely associated with individuals affiliated with communist front groups and, in the case of [delete] a Communist Party member in 1961, Galbraith's name was in the files of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.
OBSERVATION:
That despite Capp's previous background, inasmuch as he has in recent years shown a tendency toward a more conservative point of view and since his letter to the Globe does contain favorable comments regarding the Director and the Bureau, it would seem appropriate to write him a letter expressing appreciation for these kind comments.
RECOMMENDATION:
That in line with above, attached letter be sent to Mr. Capp. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, Al Capp as "the Fearless Fosdick of the youth-baiting right." That's what we're looking at in Matt Inman. Every national security state needs a sadistic cartoonist, or two or three. Otherwise, how would they make "funny" looking pictures of the Japanese in order to run a hate campaign against them, and put them in concentration camps?
| FBI -- John Kenneth Galbraith wrote: | http://www.american-buddha.com/NAZIS.foiparequestalcapp.htm
The new sages in the university world, the sources of the advice on how to end disorder, are Strom Thurmond and John McClellan and their allies of the late feudal era in the United States Senate; and Joseph Alsop, whom we had hitherto celebrated as the Edward Gibbon of the Viet Cong; and Al Capp, whom many of us had supposed was the permanent Peter Pan but who is now the Fearless Fosdick of the youth-baiting right; and J. Edgar Hoover, poor old man, as he makes the unhappy transition from the good old-fashioned Communists he knows and cherishes to the incomprehensible S. D. S.; and Spiro Agnew and Walter Annenberg. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tara Carreon
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 992
Location: Tucson, Arizona
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Al Capp wrote: | LI'L ABNER, BY AL CAPP:
THERE ISN'T A STUDENT IN AMERICA WHO DOESN'T OWN JOANIE PHOANIE'S ALBUMS: SONGS OF PEACE IN THE PHOANIE MANNER!! "LET'S RIOT TONIGHT ON THE OLD CAMPUS GROUND." "PUT THEM ALL TOGETHER -- THEY SPELL LSD!!" IF IT SOUNDS PHOANIE IT'S JOANIE. PHOANIE SONGS OF PATRIOTISM. "LAY THOSE WEAPONS DOWN, MCNAMARA." "THROW ANOTHER DRAFT CARD ON THE FIRE!!" "LET'S CONGA WITH THE VIET CONG." JOANIE SINGS HER LATEST PHOANIE. "ON A HAMMER AND SICKLE BUILT FOR TWO" --
SOME RIGHT-WINGERS FOUND THE MUSIC OF JOAN BAEZ LESS THAN INSPIRATIONAL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Home
Search
Log in
naderlibrary.com
